Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

History

Why Deforestation?

वनों की कटाई क्यों?

In this Class 9 History topic from “Forest Society and Colonialism,” students examine why forests were cleared and how colonial policies transformed forest use. They learn how railways, shipbuilding, commercial timber, plantations and expanding agriculture increased demand for wood and land. The topic also explores the effects on forest communities, shifting cultivators and pastoralists, including restrictions on customary rights, loss of livelihoods and resistance to state control. It helps students connect deforestation with colonial economic interests and social change.

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 20 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

20 questions

Choose questions
Expert · Level 51 · revenue-imperial-needs-deforestation
View options
  1. Cultivation gave tax and timber met railway and ship needs
  2. Revenue thinking returned all forests to local people
  3. Imperial needs ended timber demand
  4. Both cultivation and timber had no relation with colonial rule
Expert · Level 51 · waste-land-local-knowledge
View options
  1. Their forest based livelihood and knowledge
  2. Their maritime trade ability
  3. Their power to build railways
  4. Their colonial army
Expert · Level 51 · deforestation, colonialism, agricultural expansion, land revenue, forest society, class 9 history
View options
  1. Because land revenue from cultivable land was also important to the colonial state
  2. Because agricultural expansion ended the need for timber for railways
  3. Because there was no competition for land between forests and cultivation
  4. Because cultivation was expanded only for religious purposes under colonial rule
Expert · Level 51 · railway-sleepers-durable-timber
View options
  1. Because sleepers needed strong and durable timber
  2. Because every tree became a sleeper by itself
  3. Because railways were made only of grass
  4. Because durable timber had no use
Expert · Level 51 · ship-rail-timber-demand
View options
  1. Heavy demand for timber for imperial infrastructure
  2. End of local food shortage
  3. Complete conservation of forests
  4. Complete freedom of forest dwellers
Expert · Level 51 · plantations-local-role-change
View options
  1. Forests shifted from local livelihood to commercial production
  2. Local access to forests always increased
  3. Plantations naturally restored forests
  4. Forests lost all relation with the market
Expert · Level 51 · market-law-forest-control
View options
  1. The market wanted resources and law made control easier
  2. The market left resources and law gave forests to locals
  3. Law stopped timber demand
  4. Both market and law were separate from forests
Expert · Level 51 · deforestation, colonialism, forest society, unequal development, local communities, colonial forest policy
View options
  1. The colonial economy benefited, while local livelihoods and lives were affected
  2. Forest income was distributed equally among local communities
  3. Local forest rights remained protected even after forests were cleared
  4. Deforestation had no impact on the environment or local life
Expert · Level 51 · land-use-change-fields-plantations
View options
  1. Forest land changing into fields and plantations
  2. Fields changing into natural forests
  3. Railways changing into rivers
  4. Markets changing into grazing land
Expert · Level 51 · local-livelihood-forest-dependence
View options
  1. Because forests were the base for local food fuel fodder and produce
  2. Because locals had no relation with forests
  3. Because only British navy was local livelihood
  4. Because forests had no useful items
Expert · Level 51 · deforestation,ecological balance,soil erosion,water cycle,wildlife habitat,biodiversity
View options
  1. Removal of forests affects soil, wildlife habitats and the water cycle.
  2. Removal of forests increases habitat for all wildlife.
  3. Deforestation stops soil erosion and always increases soil fertility.
  4. Deforestation affects only the availability of timber, not natural systems.
Expert · Level 51 · plantation-economy-social-impact
View options
  1. Because it limited local forest use and controlled labour and land
  2. Because it gave all forest dwellers forest rights
  3. Because it needed no land
  4. Because it was unrelated to the market
Expert · Level 51 · knowledge-control-mapping
View options
  1. Through maps measurement and classification the state could control resources
  2. Knowledge handed forests to local people
  3. Measurement ended timber demand
  4. Classification had no relation with forest policy
Expert · Level 51 · deforestation, colonialism, railways, plantations, forest resources, class 9 history
View options
  1. Combined colonial pressure on forest resources and forest land
  2. Administrative pressure only for wildlife conservation
  3. Pressure to promote natural regeneration of forests
  4. Pressure from limited fuelwood collection by local communities
Expert · Level 52 · deforestation, colonial trade, forest society, timber demand, cash crops, plantations
View options
  1. Market demand for timber and cash crops
  2. Reserving forests for the religious use of local communities
  3. An increase in the number of naturally growing trees in forests
  4. Seasonal variation in rainfall
Expert · Level 52 · causes-consequences-deforestation
View options
  1. Because effects on local society and environment also need understanding
  2. Because British needs had no effect
  3. Because local society was separate from forests
  4. Because environment is not part of history
Expert · Level 52 · local-rights-access-restriction
View options
  1. The state increased control and rules over forest resources
  2. Local people stopped using forests
  3. Forests had no resources left
  4. Commercial demand ended
Expert · Level 52 · forests-controlled-resources
View options
  1. Forests changed from livelihood spaces into controlled resources
  2. Local use of forests increased
  3. Trade from forests ended
  4. Forest dwellers got full control
Expert · Level 52 · colonial forestry,scientific forestry,deforestation,forest society,plantations,class 9 history
View options
  1. Free village felling
  2. Leaving mixed forests unchanged
  3. Rows of a single tree species
  4. Opening all forests for grazing
Expert · Level 52 · deforestation, colonialism, maritime power, shipbuilding timber, teak, forest society
View options
  1. Strong ship timber
  2. Iron ore
  3. Cotton fibre
  4. Clay