What shows that deforestation was not one-sided development while studying its causes?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: The colonial economy benefited, while local livelihoods and lives were affected
Under colonial rule, forests were cleared on a large scale for railways, shipbuilding, plantations and agricultural expansion. The government and colonial economy gained timber and revenue, but Adivasi and other local communities lost or faced restrictions on livelihoods, grazing, fuel collection and forest rights. Thus, development did not benefit everyone equally. Option B is incorrect because the benefits were not shared equally. Exam tip: In questions on colonial forest policy, connect economic gains with their impact on local communities.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
The colonial economy benefited, while local livelihoods and lives were affected
Why is this the correct answer?
Under colonial rule, forests were cleared on a large scale for railways, shipbuilding, plantations and agricultural expansion. The government and colonial economy gained timber and revenue, but Adivasi and other local communities lost or faced restrictions on livelihoods, grazing, fuel collection and forest rights. Thus, development did not benefit everyone equally. Option B is incorrect because the benefits were not shared equally. Exam tip: In questions on colonial forest policy, connect economic gains with their impact on local communities.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Forest Society and Colonialism. Topic: Why Deforestation?.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
