Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

History

Why Deforestation?

वनों की कटाई क्यों?

In this Class 9 History topic from “Forest Society and Colonialism,” students examine why forests were cleared and how colonial policies transformed forest use. They learn how railways, shipbuilding, commercial timber, plantations and expanding agriculture increased demand for wood and land. The topic also explores the effects on forest communities, shifting cultivators and pastoralists, including restrictions on customary rights, loss of livelihoods and resistance to state control. It helps students connect deforestation with colonial economic interests and social change.

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 20 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

20 questions

Choose questions
Expert · Level 51 · deforestation,forest society and colonialism,colonialism,environmental history,analytical approach,local resistance
View options
  1. Studying the causes of deforestation, groups that benefit, its impacts, and possibilities of local resistance together
  2. Measuring only the height of felled trees
  3. Describing only the weather of the area
  4. Ending the analysis after stating only one cause of deforestation
Expert · Level 52 · labour-administrative-control
View options
  1. Local labour and administrative control
  2. Giving votes to trees
  3. Worship of rain
  4. Leaving forests completely alone
Expert · Level 51 · livelihood-versus-control
View options
  1. Livelihood versus profit and control
  2. Sea versus mountain
  3. Weather versus festival
  4. Art versus sports
Expert · Level 51 · deforestation, forest society, colonialism, environmental impact, social impact, forest livelihoods
View options
  1. Because the decline of forests affected both ecosystems and the livelihoods of local people
  2. Because deforestation affected only wildlife and trees
  3. Because the livelihoods of local communities were independent of forests
  4. Because environmental and social changes occur for unrelated reasons
Expert · Level 52 · source-perspective-deforestation
View options
  1. Colonial records may stress revenue while local memory may stress livelihood
  2. All sources always say the same thing
  3. Local memory is not useful in history
  4. Records have no relation with interests
Expert · Level 52 · balanced-historical-conclusion
View options
  1. It was a combined process of revenue timber plantations transport and local impacts
  2. It was only the result of rain
  3. It was only farmers' fault
  4. It was complete forest conservation
Expert · Level 51 · forest society and colonialism,deforestation,colonial forest policy,local rights,forest laws,class 9 history
View options
  1. As colonial profit increased, local communities’ forest access and rights could be restricted
  2. Colonial profit automatically strengthened local communities’ forest rights
  3. Colonial profit and local rights were completely unrelated in deforestation
  4. Local forest rights ended the colonial demand for timber
Expert · Level 51 · multi-causal-explanation
View options
  1. Population pressure along with revenue railways ships plantations market and state control
  2. Only one natural storm
  3. Only local people's wish
  4. Only age of trees
Expert · Level 51 · forest-society-colonial-economy
View options
  1. Forests were a base of local life but colonial economy made them controlled profitable resources
  2. Forests had no relation with local life
  3. Colonial economy did not use forests
  4. Deforestation was only climate change
Expert · Level 52 · waste-land-revenue-policy
View options
  1. Giving forest rights to local communities
  2. Bringing forests into cultivation and revenue system
  3. Making forests fully sacred areas
  4. Stopping all railway routes
Expert · Level 52 · agricultural-expansion-land-revenue
View options
  1. Cultivable land could provide land tax
  2. Farming ended timber for ships
  3. Farming automatically made forests dense
  4. Farming removed colonial control
Expert · Level 52 · colonial forestry,deforestation,railway expansion,railway sleepers,forest society,indian history
View options
  1. Only passenger comfort and ticket sales
  2. Only tea trade and port fees
  3. Timber for sleepers and land for routes
  4. Grazing and fuel for forest dwellers
Expert · Level 52 · durable-timber-railway-sleepers
View options
  1. It was limited only to house repair
  2. It was a small local need
  3. It was a forest protection policy
  4. It required large scale regular and strong timber
Expert · Level 52 · shipbuilding-naval-power-timber
View options
  1. Naval power and maritime trade
  2. Local festivals and folk songs
  3. Forest worship and pilgrimage
  4. Grazing system and cattle fairs
Expert · Level 52 · oak-shortage-indian-timber
View options
  1. Because timber use had stopped in India
  2. Because alternative durable timber was needed for shipbuilding
  3. Because Indian forests had no useful trees
  4. Because Britain had left maritime trade
Expert · Level 52 · teak-sal-commercial-forestry
View options
  1. Complete biodiversity conservation
  2. Local community self rule
  3. Selective use based on commercial value
  4. No economic importance of forests
Expert · Level 52 · tea-plantations-land-use-change
View options
  1. Forest land shifted from local livelihood to market based production
  2. Forest land was fully given to forest dwellers
  3. Forest land lost relation with trade
  4. Forest land became only wildlife protection
Expert · Level 52 · deforestation, plantation agriculture, coffee plantations, rubber plantations, colonialism, cash crops, export economy
View options
  1. Natural forests were removed to develop large monoculture cash-crop plantations
  2. Plantations were established only on barren land, so forests were unaffected
  3. Coffee and rubber were grown mainly as food for local households
  4. The colonial government banned coffee and rubber cultivation to protect forests
Expert · Level 52 · state-market-link-deforestation
View options
  1. The market created demand and the state made control and rules
  2. The market ended timber demand and the state withdrew
  3. The state returned all forests to local people
  4. Both market and state stayed away from forests
Expert · Level 52 · deforestation, colonial forestry, forest society and colonialism, population growth, railways, plantations, colonial revenue
View options
  1. Because population growth was the only cause of deforestation in every region
  2. Because colonial revenue policies, railways, shipbuilding, plantations and market demands also increased forest loss
  3. Because most deforestation was a natural event that occurred in a single day
  4. Because the expansion of agriculture increased forest cover in all circumstances