How should the relation between colonial profit and local rights in deforestation be understood?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: As colonial profit increased, local communities’ forest access and rights could be restricted
Colonial governments treated forests as sources of timber, revenue and land for railways, ships, construction and plantations. Forest laws and reserved forests often restricted grazing, fuelwood collection, shifting cultivation and other customary uses by local communities. Thus, policies designed to increase colonial profit could limit local rights. Option B is incorrect because such rights were not automatically strengthened; they were often curtailed. Exam tip: link colonial demand for timber and revenue with restrictions on customary forest rights.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
As colonial profit increased, local communities’ forest access and rights could be restricted
Why is this the correct answer?
Colonial governments treated forests as sources of timber, revenue and land for railways, ships, construction and plantations. Forest laws and reserved forests often restricted grazing, fuelwood collection, shifting cultivation and other customary uses by local communities. Thus, policies designed to increase colonial profit could limit local rights. Option B is incorrect because such rights were not automatically strengthened; they were often curtailed. Exam tip: link colonial demand for timber and revenue with restrictions on customary forest rights.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Forest Society and Colonialism. Topic: Why Deforestation?.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
