Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
To enable a higher court to review a lower court’s decision and correct possible errors
To end all cases quickly without a hearing
To abolish lower courts and retain only one court
To allow courts to make new laws
Medium · Level 67 · role of judiciary,rights,justiceView options
It settles disputes and protects rights
It only conducts elections
It appoints ministers
It votes on laws in Parliament
Medium · Level 67 · lok adalat,speedy justice,settlementView options
Speedy and settlement-based justice
Debate in Parliament
Appointment of Governor
Tax collection
Medium · Level 67 · public trust,transparency,judiciaryView options
Fair and transparent decisions
Party propaganda
Secret and reasonless decisions
Decisions under government pressure
Medium · Level 67 · supreme court,judgment,precedentView options
Because they are decisions of the highest court of the country
Because they apply only to schools
Because they are election posters
Because they are outside law
Medium · Level 67 · high court,supervision,subordinate courtsView options
Over subordinate courts in its state
Over both Houses of Parliament
Over the President
Over the Election Commission
Medium · Level 67 · free legal aid,access to justice,judiciary,legal rights,economic disadvantage,civics class 9View options
For weaker and economically disadvantaged sections
Only for government ministers
Only for large businesspersons
Only for foreign companies
Medium · Level 67 · natural justice,fair hearing,judicial independence,judiciary,civics class 9View options
Both sides should get a chance to be heard
Only the powerful side should speak
Decision should be without hearing
Judge should be a party himself
Medium · Level 67 · mandamus,writ,public dutyView options
Mandamus
Habeas corpus
Quo warranto
Certiorari
Medium · Level 67 · open court proceedings,judicial transparency,judiciary,public confidence,civics class 9View options
Transparency in the judicial process increases
Judicial decisions are kept completely secret from the public
Citizens lose access to courts and the right to be heard
Courts no longer need to apply the law
Medium · Level 67 · judicial delay,timely justice,casesView options
Difficulty in getting timely justice
All rights automatically become stronger
Cases end immediately
Need for courts ends
Medium · Level 67 · judiciary,government power,judicial review,rule of law,constitutional checksView options
By examining the legality of government actions
By contesting elections in place of the government
By writing the content of government advertisements
By increasing tax collection for the government
Medium · Level 67 · rule of law,equality before law,judiciary,judicial independence,working of institutionsView options
Judiciary ensures that everyone is subject to the law
The judiciary itself is above the law
The judiciary hears cases only of elected leaders
The judiciary abolishes citizens’ fundamental rights
Medium · Level 67 · judicial independence,democracy,rightsView options
So citizens can get fair justice and protection of rights
So courts become political parties
So government writes every judgment
So rights are not needed
Medium · Level 67 · judicial independence,fundamental rights,citizen protectionView options
Because it can decide free from pressure of government and powerful people
Because it campaigns in elections
Because it prepares budget
Because it allocates portfolios to ministers
Medium · Level 67 · appeal system,high court,supreme courtView options
A wrong decision can be re-examined at a higher level
All courts get closed
Government works without law
Electoral roll gets removed automatically
Medium · Level 67 · judicial review,government power,checks and balancesView options
By checking government laws and actions on the basis of the Constitution
By giving unlimited power to government
By making Parliament a court
By removing the Election Commission
Medium · Level 67 · certiorari,writ,court orderView options
To quash a wrong order of a lower court or authority
Only to release a person from jail
To order an officer to perform duty
To question authority to hold public office
Medium · Level 67 · reasoned judgment,transparency,justiceView options
It makes the decision transparent and understandable
It makes justice completely secret
It ends the right to appeal
It removes the need for law
Medium · Level 67 · impartiality,bias,fair justiceView options
So the decision remains free from bias
So the decision is given without hearing
So only the government's side is heard
So court proceedings remain secret
Question 1MediumLevel 67
Why is the appeal system necessary in courts?
Correct answer: A
The appeal system allows a party to challenge a lower court’s decision before a higher court. The higher court may review the evidence, application of law, or procedural errors, which helps make justice fairer. Option D is incorrect because making laws is primarily the function of the legislature. Exam tip: remember appeal as review of a decision and correction of errors.
Free legal aid is especially useful for weaker and economically disadvantaged people who cannot afford a lawyer or the costs of litigation. It helps them approach courts and seek justice. Ministers and large businesspersons can generally bear legal expenses, so they are not the main target group. Exam tip: Link free legal aid with ‘equal access to justice’.
A key principle of natural justice is that a person must receive a fair opportunity to present their case before a decision is made against them. Therefore, both sides must be given a chance to be heard. A decision without hearing violates this principle, while a judge being a party to the case violates impartiality. Exam tip: Remember this as the principle of ‘hearing both sides’ or ‘fair hearing’.
In open court proceedings, members of the public and the media can generally observe hearings. This makes the judicial process more transparent and keeps the conduct of judges, lawyers and parties under public scrutiny. It does not mean that every case is open; cases involving children, sexual offences or national security may be heard privately. Exam tip: link open hearings with transparency and public confidence in the judiciary.
The judiciary examines whether government laws, orders and actions conform to the Constitution and other laws. If an action is illegal or unconstitutional, a court may strike it down or issue directions against it. Contesting elections is a role of political parties and the legislature, not the judiciary. Exam tip: Link this function with judicial review and the rule of law.
Rule of law means that no person or institution is above the law, and the law applies equally in similar circumstances. The judiciary interprets laws, settles disputes, and helps ensure that everyone, including the government, acts according to law. Therefore, option A is correct. Option B is wrong because the judiciary too functions under the Constitution and law. Exam tip: Link ‘rule of law’ with ‘equality before law’.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy