Free and fair electoral competition

Question 1HardLevel 9

If appointment process of election commission is fully controlled by ruling party what risk increases?

ARisk of institutional biasBIncrease in votersCShort ballotDClear manifesto

Question 2HardLevel 9

If all parties are in the election field but critical speech is banned which element declines?

AFree competition of ideasBVoting dateCNumber of boothsDCandidate age

Question 3HardLevel 9

If a voter is falsely told before voting that their name is not on the list what is this an example of?

AVoter suppressionBManifesto educationCOpen countingDPeaceful campaign

Question 4HardLevel 9

In which situation will people's trust in the electoral process decline most?

ASecret voting and open counting occurBOpposition campaignsCAll parties follow rulesDCounting is changed without supervision

Question 5HardLevel 9

If all get campaign time but supporters of one party are threatened and stopped from attending meetings what is the problem?

AReal campaign freedom is weakBNo problem because campaign time is equalCCounting is completeDVoter list is correct

Question 6HardLevel 9

If rules are fair but the institution applying them is biased what conclusion follows?

AFairness will be weak in implementationBElection is fully idealCVoters will get more choicesDResult is already correct

Question 7HardLevel 9

Which example fulfils many conditions of free and fair electoral competition together?

AAll parties campaign voters vote without fear and counting is transparentBOnly one party campaignsCVoters vote under threatDResult is written in advance

Question 8HardLevel 9

If voters are free but opposition information does not reach the constituency what may the result not fully show?

AFully informed public willBDate of pollingCSecrecy of ballotDNumber of voters

Question 9HardLevel 9

Which question is most useful in a strict test of free and fair electoral competition?

ACan voters choose among real options without fear and with correct informationBIs the election poster beautifulCDo leaders use popular slogansDIs there colourful decoration at booth

Question 10HardLevel 9

What is the most mature conclusion about free and fair electoral competition?

AReal choice equal opportunity fear free voting correct information and transparent counting are all necessaryBOnly polling date is enoughCRuling party should get extra advantageDLimiting opposition is fairness

Question 11ExpertLevel 7

If opposition parties are legally recognised before an election but their rallies are repeatedly denied, which electoral condition is most weakened?

AReal and equal electoral competitionBVoter ageCBallot printingDNumber of election symbols

Question 12ExpertLevel 7

If the election commission uses different standards for ruling party and opposition complaints, what is the main democratic problem?

ALack of polling boothsBBreakdown of institutional neutralityCExcess voter educationDEquality of election symbols

Question 13ExpertLevel 7

If voters cast votes freely but counting is done behind closed doors without observation, what doubt arises?

ADoubt about campaign lengthBDoubt about candidate qualificationCDoubt about transparency and credibility of resultsDDoubt about voting age

Question 14ExpertLevel 7

If many parties are in an election but all major media platforms show only one party, why will real choice weaken?

AVoters will be too manyBVoting will become secretCCounting will become fastDVoters cannot make informed comparison of alternatives

Question 15ExpertLevel 7

If election rules are suddenly changed so that only the ruling party gets extra campaign time, which principle is harmed?

ALevel electoral fieldBSecrecy of votingCVoter ageDLanguage of ballot

Question 16ExpertLevel 7

If polling booths are fewer and farther in poor areas while closer in rich areas, which concern is most appropriate?

AProblem of election symbolsBProblem of equal participation and actual accessCProblem of campaign slogansDProblem of candidate age

Question 17ExpertLevel 7

If the ruling party uses government employees and vehicles in election campaign, what happens to electoral fairness?

AFairness will strengthenBVoting age will reduceCGovernment neutrality and equal opportunity will weakenDOpposition will gain more power

Question 18ExpertLevel 7

If names are removed on a large scale only from opposition-supporting localities, which conclusion is most logical?

AVoters are more freeBCounting will be more accurateCCampaign is more balancedDSelective exclusion weakens fair participation

Question 19ExpertLevel 7

If voting is secret but a local strongman threatens voters before voting, why is freedom incomplete?

ABecause fear can affect choice beforehandBBecause secret voting is wrongCBecause voter list is longDBecause candidates are many

Question 20ExpertLevel 7

If candidates are allowed nomination but their bank accounts are unfairly frozen, what will be affected?

ADistance of polling boothsBEffective campaign capacity and real competitionCColour of ballot paperDVoter age

Free and fair electoral competition

Quiz this set

If appointment process of election commission is fully controlled by ruling party what risk increases?

If all parties are in the election field but critical speech is banned which element declines?

If a voter is falsely told before voting that their name is not on the list what is this an example of?

In which situation will people's trust in the electoral process decline most?

If all get campaign time but supporters of one party are threatened and stopped from attending meetings what is the problem?

If rules are fair but the institution applying them is biased what conclusion follows?

Which example fulfils many conditions of free and fair electoral competition together?

If voters are free but opposition information does not reach the constituency what may the result not fully show?

Which question is most useful in a strict test of free and fair electoral competition?

What is the most mature conclusion about free and fair electoral competition?

If opposition parties are legally recognised before an election but their rallies are repeatedly denied, which electoral condition is most weakened?

If the election commission uses different standards for ruling party and opposition complaints, what is the main democratic problem?

If voters cast votes freely but counting is done behind closed doors without observation, what doubt arises?

If many parties are in an election but all major media platforms show only one party, why will real choice weaken?

If election rules are suddenly changed so that only the ruling party gets extra campaign time, which principle is harmed?

If polling booths are fewer and farther in poor areas while closer in rich areas, which concern is most appropriate?

If the ruling party uses government employees and vehicles in election campaign, what happens to electoral fairness?

If names are removed on a large scale only from opposition-supporting localities, which conclusion is most logical?

If voting is secret but a local strongman threatens voters before voting, why is freedom incomplete?

If candidates are allowed nomination but their bank accounts are unfairly frozen, what will be affected?

Quiz result

Free and fair electoral competition

Quiz this set

If appointment process of election commission is fully controlled by ruling party what risk increases?

If all parties are in the election field but critical speech is banned which element declines?

If a voter is falsely told before voting that their name is not on the list what is this an example of?

In which situation will people's trust in the electoral process decline most?

If all get campaign time but supporters of one party are threatened and stopped from attending meetings what is the problem?

If rules are fair but the institution applying them is biased what conclusion follows?

Which example fulfils many conditions of free and fair electoral competition together?

If voters are free but opposition information does not reach the constituency what may the result not fully show?

Which question is most useful in a strict test of free and fair electoral competition?

What is the most mature conclusion about free and fair electoral competition?

If opposition parties are legally recognised before an election but their rallies are repeatedly denied, which electoral condition is most weakened?

If the election commission uses different standards for ruling party and opposition complaints, what is the main democratic problem?

If voters cast votes freely but counting is done behind closed doors without observation, what doubt arises?

If many parties are in an election but all major media platforms show only one party, why will real choice weaken?

If election rules are suddenly changed so that only the ruling party gets extra campaign time, which principle is harmed?

If polling booths are fewer and farther in poor areas while closer in rich areas, which concern is most appropriate?

If the ruling party uses government employees and vehicles in election campaign, what happens to electoral fairness?

If names are removed on a large scale only from opposition-supporting localities, which conclusion is most logical?

If voting is secret but a local strongman threatens voters before voting, why is freedom incomplete?

If candidates are allowed nomination but their bank accounts are unfairly frozen, what will be affected?

Quiz result

Analytics choices