Free and fair electoral competition

Question 1HardLevel 7

If voters vote freely but opposition candidates are stopped from nomination, what is the main weakness?

AReal electoral competition is weakBSecrecy of voting is too highCVoter list is too longDCounting is too slow

Question 2HardLevel 7

In which situation will an election look competitive externally but not be fair?

AAll candidates get equal campaign timeBRuling side uses state resources for special advantage while opposition lacks resourcesCVoters vote secretlyDCounting is open and accurate

Question 3HardLevel 7

If the election commission cancels opposition rallies under ruling party pressure, which principle is broken?

AInstitutional neutralityBHereditary ruleCVoting ageDLanguage of ballot

Question 4HardLevel 7

If voting is secret but the ruling side changes results during counting, why is the election not fair?

ABecause secret voting is wrongBBecause there are many candidatesCBecause the result does not reflect actual votesDBecause the campaign is long

Question 5HardLevel 7

If many parties contest but media shows policies of only one party, which ability of voters is affected?

AAbility to make informed comparisonBAbility to find polling boothCAbility to fold ballot paperDAbility to understand voting age

Question 6HardLevel 7

In which situation will both freedom and fairness be affected together?

AVoters are threatened and counting is also alteredBAll parties campaignCVoting is secretDVoter list is correct

Question 7HardLevel 7

If polling booths are deliberately kept far from some poor localities, what is the main electoral problem?

ABarrier to equal participationBLack of campaign songCSmall size of ballot paperDToo many candidates

Question 8HardLevel 7

If the losing party is stopped from contesting the next election, what will be the effect on competition?

ACompetition will become permanently weakBCounting will become more accurateCVoters will be more freeDSecret ballot will become stronger

Question 9HardLevel 7

If election rules are changed just before voting only to benefit the ruling side, what becomes doubtful?

AFairness of rulesBVoting ageCPrinting of ballot paperDVoter citizenship

Question 10HardLevel 7

What democratic concern arises from excessive use of money power in elections?

AVoice of less-resourced candidates may be suppressedBVoting becomes more secretCVoter list corrects automaticallyDCounting becomes faster

Question 11HardLevel 7

If voters face threats of revenge after voting, why does secret ballot become more important?

ABecause it protects voters' choice from pressureBBecause it fixes results beforehandCBecause it removes oppositionDBecause it changes voter list

Question 12HardLevel 7

If some candidates have legal rights but administration does not allow them to hold meetings, what does it show?

ADifference between paper rights and real fairnessBDifference in voting ageCDifference in counting speedDDifference in ballot colour

Question 13HardLevel 7

In which example will election result be farthest from people's real will?

AVoters are free and counting is correctBVoters vote in fear and counting is also changedCAll parties campaignDVoting is secret

Question 14HardLevel 7

If everyone has voting right but many eligible citizens are deliberately removed from the list, which principle is weakened?

APractical franchiseBElection postersCCampaign languageDCounting time

Question 15HardLevel 7

If opposition exists but its ideas are not allowed to reach people, why is real choice weak?

AVoters cannot compare alternativesBVoters become more freeCResults become more accurateDPolling booths increase

Question 16HardLevel 7

If government announces benefits only favouring the ruling side before elections and blocks opposition campaign, what is the concern?

AEqual opportunity and fair competition will weakenBVote secrecy will increaseCCounting will automatically be correctDCandidate age will decrease

Question 17HardLevel 7

In which situation will credibility of the election institution decline most?

AIt applies same rules to all partiesBIt hears ruling side complaints quickly but ignores opposition complaintsCIt keeps counting publicDIt conducts peaceful voting

Question 18HardLevel 7

If citizens are misled by false rumours in elections, what happens to free decision-making?

AInformed and free choice weakensBBallot paper becomes strongerCPolling booths increaseDNomination becomes easier

Question 19HardLevel 7

If a party can openly contest but its supporters are blocked from reaching polling booths, which conclusion is correct?

ACompetition is completely fairBThere is unfair restriction on voter participationCSecrecy of voting has increasedDElection result is more credible

Question 20HardLevel 7

Why are equal campaign opportunity and accurate counting both necessary in fair electoral competition?

AThe first gives voters choice and the second gives result of real votesBThe first stops voting and the second stops campaignCBoth remove oppositionDBoth fix results beforehand

Free and fair electoral competition

Quiz this set

If voters vote freely but opposition candidates are stopped from nomination, what is the main weakness?

In which situation will an election look competitive externally but not be fair?

If the election commission cancels opposition rallies under ruling party pressure, which principle is broken?

If voting is secret but the ruling side changes results during counting, why is the election not fair?

If many parties contest but media shows policies of only one party, which ability of voters is affected?

In which situation will both freedom and fairness be affected together?

If polling booths are deliberately kept far from some poor localities, what is the main electoral problem?

If the losing party is stopped from contesting the next election, what will be the effect on competition?

If election rules are changed just before voting only to benefit the ruling side, what becomes doubtful?

What democratic concern arises from excessive use of money power in elections?

If voters face threats of revenge after voting, why does secret ballot become more important?

If some candidates have legal rights but administration does not allow them to hold meetings, what does it show?

In which example will election result be farthest from people's real will?

If everyone has voting right but many eligible citizens are deliberately removed from the list, which principle is weakened?

If opposition exists but its ideas are not allowed to reach people, why is real choice weak?

If government announces benefits only favouring the ruling side before elections and blocks opposition campaign, what is the concern?

In which situation will credibility of the election institution decline most?

If citizens are misled by false rumours in elections, what happens to free decision-making?

If a party can openly contest but its supporters are blocked from reaching polling booths, which conclusion is correct?

Why are equal campaign opportunity and accurate counting both necessary in fair electoral competition?

Quiz result

Free and fair electoral competition

Quiz this set

If voters vote freely but opposition candidates are stopped from nomination, what is the main weakness?

In which situation will an election look competitive externally but not be fair?

If the election commission cancels opposition rallies under ruling party pressure, which principle is broken?

If voting is secret but the ruling side changes results during counting, why is the election not fair?

If many parties contest but media shows policies of only one party, which ability of voters is affected?

In which situation will both freedom and fairness be affected together?

If polling booths are deliberately kept far from some poor localities, what is the main electoral problem?

If the losing party is stopped from contesting the next election, what will be the effect on competition?

If election rules are changed just before voting only to benefit the ruling side, what becomes doubtful?

What democratic concern arises from excessive use of money power in elections?

If voters face threats of revenge after voting, why does secret ballot become more important?

If some candidates have legal rights but administration does not allow them to hold meetings, what does it show?

In which example will election result be farthest from people's real will?

If everyone has voting right but many eligible citizens are deliberately removed from the list, which principle is weakened?

If opposition exists but its ideas are not allowed to reach people, why is real choice weak?

If government announces benefits only favouring the ruling side before elections and blocks opposition campaign, what is the concern?

In which situation will credibility of the election institution decline most?

If citizens are misled by false rumours in elections, what happens to free decision-making?

If a party can openly contest but its supporters are blocked from reaching polling booths, which conclusion is correct?

Why are equal campaign opportunity and accurate counting both necessary in fair electoral competition?

Quiz result

Analytics choices