Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In Class 10 General Knowledge under the Indian History chapter, Modern Indian History introduces students to India’s journey from colonial rule to independence and the early shaping of the modern nation. Students learn about significant political, social, and nationalist developments, key leaders and movements, and how these events influenced India’s public life and democratic identity.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Expert · Level 8View options
It laid foundations of political language, organisation and economic criticism
It immediately launched armed revolution
It made India a republic
It closed British Parliament
Expert · Level 8View options
To leave foreign goods and increase both indigenous production and political pressure
To strengthen British trade
To restore Company rule
To increase tax on all peasants
Expert · Level 8View options
Building unity through songs, festivals, Rakhi and national education
Only holding British banquets
Increasing Company army
Separating princely states
Expert · Level 8View options
Growing discussion of separate representation and community-based political interests
Universal adult franchise
Establishment of Indian republic
Complete integration of princely states
Expert · Level 8View options
Congress and League cooperated but separate electorates were also accepted
Congress and League fought a war
Congress ended and League formed
India was declared a republic
Expert · Level 8View options
Raising local injustice through non-violent Satyagraha and negotiation
Taking power through armed war
Expanding Company trade
Implementing Bengal partition
Expert · Level 8View options
Non-violent collective moral protest
Secret military attack
Support for British tax
Princely annexation
Expert · Level 8View options
Loss of faith in moral legitimacy of British rule
Expansion of Company trade
Integration of princely states
Return of Sati
Expert · Level 8View options
Rejection of colonial honour and legitimacy
Honour of British army
Only boycott of train
Acceptance of Company Diwani
Expert · Level 8View options
Council entry versus emphasis on constructive programme
Support for Sati versus opposition to Sati
Railways versus postal system
France versus Portugal
Expert · Level 8View options
Direction of secular constitutional nationalism
Return of Company rule
Armed monarchy
Increase of colonial tax
Expert · Level 8View options
It linked complete independence with a daily issue of common people
It supported British army
It expanded Company trade
It divided princely states
Expert · Level 8View options
No basic political agreement emerged between Indian groups and British government
They immediately freed India
Congress equally attended all conferences
They had no constitutional issue
Expert · Level 8View options
Balancing depressed class representation with national electoral framework
Increasing British army
Restoring Company trade
Implementing Bengal partition
Expert · Level 8View options
Judicial mechanism for centre-province disputes
Expansion of Company trade
Restarting Sati
End of Swadeshi Movement
Expert · Level 8View options
Experience of running provincial governments and public policies
Experience of running Company army
Experience of running French trade
Experience of giving states to Britain
Expert · Level 8View options
It was a post-war promise and not immediate transfer of power
It was immediate full republic
It made all provinces independent
It gave permanent power to Congress
Expert · Level 8View options
Local people were challenging British authority through alternative power
British rule had become stronger
Congress had ended the movement
Muslim League had made a constitution
Expert · Level 8View options
Spirit of national unity above religion and community
Return of Company rule
Support for Bengal partition
Restoration of Sati
Expert · Level 8View options
It also included colonial humiliation, poor conditions and nationalist atmosphere
It was only repetition of Plassey
It was only Sati reform
It was only university dispute
Expert · Level 8View options
It could give more autonomy to Muslim-majority groups
It ended Congress
It removed British army
It gave princely states to France
Expert · Level 8View options
Problems of boundary, displacement and communal violence
Only problem of education fees
Only problem of railway colour
Only problem of university exams
Expert · Level 8View options
India's authority would be derived from the people
India's authority would be derived from the Company
India's authority would be derived from France
India's authority would be derived only from princely states
Expert · Level 8View options
Combined use of diplomacy, pressure and legal documents
Use of only foreign army
Leaving all states independent
Handing India to British Parliament
Expert · Level 8View options
Entry of private British traders into Indian trade increased
India became independent immediately
Mughal rule was restored
Congress got rule
Question 1ExpertLevel 8
Why would it be wrong to call Moderate Congress petition politics completely weak?
Correct answer: A
The direct answer is A: it laid foundations of political language, organisation and economic criticism. Moderate leaders used petitions, speeches, meetings and constitutional demands rather than immediate violence. Their method had limitations because British rulers often ignored their requests, and their mass base was limited. However, it would be incorrect to call the method completely weak, because it trained Indians in public debate, created political associations, developed an all-India platform through the Congress, and exposed economic exploitation such as the drain of wealth. Option A is correct because these long-term foundations helped later nationalist movements. Option B is wrong: Moderates did not immediately launch armed revolution; that belonged to different later or parallel revolutionary trends. Option C is wrong: they did not make India a republic. Option D is wrong: they could not close the British Parliament. The safe exam approach is to mention both contribution and limitation. Memory cue: moderate means constitutional method, not no contribution.
Why was choosing Salt Satyagraha after Poorna Swaraj resolution strategically effective?
Correct answer: A
The direct answer is Option A: it linked the goal of complete independence with a daily issue of common people. The Poorna Swaraj resolution gave the national movement a clear political aim—complete independence. The Salt Satyagraha then selected salt, an item used by every household, rich or poor. The British salt laws and tax affected ordinary people, and the government monopoly made salt a powerful symbol of unfair rule. The reasoning is: complete independence was a large and difficult political idea; salt was familiar to every person; connecting the two made the freedom struggle understandable and participatory for ordinary people; therefore the movement could mobilize a much wider population. Option A is correct. Option B is wrong because the Salt Satyagraha challenged British authority rather than supporting the British army. Option C is wrong because it did not expand East India Company trade; the Company had ceased to be the governing power after 1858. Option D is wrong because the movement was not intended to divide princely states. Gandhi’s choice of salt showed strategic understanding: a simple everyday object could represent an unjust law and unite people. Exam cue: when a national goal is connected to an ordinary person’s daily problem, mass participation becomes easier.
What did the joint defence of Sehgal, Dhillon and Shah Nawaz in INA trials symbolise?
Correct answer: A
The direct answer is A: the joint defence symbolised national unity above religion and community. Sehgal, Dhillon and Shah Nawaz belonged to different religious communities, yet they were defended together during the INA trials. The Indian National Army had fought under Subhas Chandra Bose, and the trials at the Red Fort produced broad public sympathy. Step by step, the names represented different communities; the common legal defence brought them together; public support showed that anti-colonial nationalism could cross religious divisions. Option A is correct because the event became a powerful symbol of united Indian feeling. Option B is wrong: the trials did not restore Company rule; the East India Company had already lost political power long before. Option C is wrong: the event did not support the 1905 partition of Bengal. Option D is wrong: it had no connection with restoring sati. Remember the three names and connect them with INA, Red Fort trials and national unity.
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy