Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why is divisibility reasoning necessary instead of approximate decimal in the proof of (\sqrt{3})?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because divisibility reasoning gives a complete proof

An approximate decimal tells us only that a number is close to a displayed value. It does not describe all of its digits and therefore cannot establish an exact claim about rationality. To prove that \(\sqrt{3}\) is irrational, we need an argument that works for every possible fraction representing it, not just a numerical estimate. Divisibility gives that exact structure.

Assume \(\sqrt{3}=p/q\) in lowest form, where \(q\neq0\). Squaring gives \(p^2=3q^2\), so 3 divides \(p^2\), which implies that 3 divides \(p\). Substituting \(p=3k\) then shows that 3 divides \(q\) as well. Both numbers would share 3, contradicting lowest form. Thus option A is correct.

Related tags

Number-SystemsSqrt3Proof-MethodExpert

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

Because divisibility reasoning gives a complete proof

Why is this the correct answer?

An approximate decimal tells us only that a number is close to a displayed value. It does not describe all of its digits and therefore cannot establish an exact claim about rationality. To prove that \(\sqrt{3}\) is irrational, we need an argument that works for every possible fraction representing it, not just a numerical estimate. Divisibility gives that exact structure.

Assume \(\sqrt{3}=p/q\) in lowest form, where \(q\neq0\). Squaring gives \(p^2=3q^2\), so 3 divides \(p^2\), which implies that 3 divides \(p\). Substituting \(p=3k\) then shows that 3 divides \(q\) as well. Both numbers would share 3, contradicting lowest form. Thus option A is correct.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 Mathematics question. Chapter: Number Systems. Topic: Proof of irrationality of square root 2 and square root 3.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement