Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

What is the most important exam caution in the proofs of √2 and √3?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: While assuming rationality, write the fraction in lowest coprime form

The correct answer is A. In a contradiction proof, assume √2 or √3 equals p/q, where p and q are integers, q is nonzero, and the fraction is already in lowest terms, meaning gcd(p,q) = 1. For √2 the argument eventually shows both numerator and denominator are even; for √3 it shows both are divisible by 3. The contradiction is meaningful only because a lowest-form fraction cannot have a common prime factor. If the fraction is not reduced at the start, the later divisibility result may simply describe a non-reduced representation and no contradiction follows. A denominator cannot be zero, decimals are not a substitute for proof, and numerator and denominator need not be equal.

Related tags

Number SystemsCoprime FractionIrrationality ProofExam CautionProof Of Irrationality Of Square Root 2 And Square Root 3MathematicsClass 9 Mcq

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

While assuming rationality, write the fraction in lowest coprime form

Why is this the correct answer?

The correct answer is A. In a contradiction proof, assume √2 or √3 equals p/q, where p and q are integers, q is nonzero, and the fraction is already in lowest terms, meaning gcd(p,q) = 1. For √2 the argument eventually shows both numerator and denominator are even; for √3 it shows both are divisible by 3. The contradiction is meaningful only because a lowest-form fraction cannot have a common prime factor. If the fraction is not reduced at the start, the later divisibility result may simply describe a non-reduced representation and no contradiction follows. A denominator cannot be zero, decimals are not a substitute for proof, and numerator and denominator need not be equal.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 Mathematics question. Chapter: Number Systems. Topic: Proof of irrationality of square root 2 and square root 3.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement