Rule of law and respect for rights

Question 1MediumLevel 13

Why cannot rights be given only to the majority in democracy?

ABecause majority does not need rightsBBecause rights are not related to electionsCBecause minorities do not need lawDBecause rights are for dignity and protection of every citizen

Question 2MediumLevel 13

If a leader says after winning election he is above law, what is the correct democratic response?

AEven after winning election leader remains under lawBLaw ends after winning electionCLeader's order itself is justiceDRights are only for leader

Question 3MediumLevel 13

If a citizen asks questions about government policy, it is generally linked with which right?

AMonarchyBFreedom of expressionCMilitary orderDHereditary right

Question 4MediumLevel 13

If an accused person gets a lawyer and a chance to defend in court, what does it strengthen?

AArbitrary arrestBSecret punishmentCFair processDExemption from law

Question 5MediumLevel 13

If government stops religious prayer of a group without valid reason, which right is affected?

ASecrecy of votingBElection resultCTaxationDReligious freedom

Question 6MediumLevel 13

Why are rule of law and respect for rights necessary together?

ALaw limits power and rights protect citizensBLaw always removes rightsCRights make government unlimitedDBoth end elections

Question 7MediumLevel 13

If court decides only according to government's wish, which principle becomes weak?

AVoter listBIndependent justice and rule of lawCCampaign freedomDElection symbol

Question 8MediumLevel 13

Which example shows both respect for rights and obedience to law?

APunishment without hearingBAllowing peaceful assembly according to rulesCExempting leader from lawDClosing newspaper without reason

Question 9MediumLevel 13

If administration punishes a person only due to personal enmity, what is the problem?

ARule-based governance is strongBRights are secureCArbitrariness and violation of rule of lawDDemocracy is more just

Question 10MediumLevel 13

If parliament makes a law that removes basic rights without proper reason, what question arises?

AQuestion of language of lawBQuestion of printing of lawCQuestion of election dateDQuestion of respect for rights and constitutional limit

Question 11MediumLevel 13

If a citizen gets the opportunity to seek information, which democratic purpose does it help?

AAccountability and rights protectionBKing's powerCSecret ruleDArbitrary punishment

Question 12MediumLevel 13

If a powerful person commits a crime and no investigation happens, what happens to rule of law?

AIt will strengthenBIt will weakenCIt will remain unaffectedDIt will automatically improve

Question 13MediumLevel 13

If a law is used only to benefit government supporters, it is against what?

AEqual law and fair governanceBElection campaignCVoting ageDPolling booth

Question 14MediumLevel 13

If a school teacher is removed from job for criticising the government, which right may be affected?

AVote countingBFreedom of expressionCElection symbolDVoter list

Question 15MediumLevel 13

If a person is treated as guilty before the crime is proved, what weakens?

AMilitary disciplineBVoting facilityCFair process and presumption of innocenceDElection campaign

Question 16MediumLevel 13

If a law is vague and officials apply it according to their wish, what is the danger?

ALaw will become more certainBRights will automatically strengthenCElection will become more fairDArbitrariness and harm to rights

Question 17MediumLevel 13

Why is citizens' right to appeal in court important?

ATo challenge a wrong decisionBTo give unlimited power to governmentCTo end rightsDTo stop elections

Question 18MediumLevel 13

In which situation will civil liberty and security both be better protected?

APolice arrests without rulesBArrest happens with legal reason and processCCourts remain closedDGovernment stops criticism

Question 19MediumLevel 13

If the majority bans a small group from speaking its language, what is affected?

AElection dateBVoter listCCultural rights and freedomDVote counting

Question 20MediumLevel 13

Why is rule of law not fulfilled merely by having laws?

ABecause equal and just application of law is also necessaryBBecause law is not neededCBecause leaders are above lawDBecause rights should always be removed

Rule of law and respect for rights

Quiz this set

Why cannot rights be given only to the majority in democracy?

If a leader says after winning election he is above law, what is the correct democratic response?

If a citizen asks questions about government policy, it is generally linked with which right?

If an accused person gets a lawyer and a chance to defend in court, what does it strengthen?

If government stops religious prayer of a group without valid reason, which right is affected?

Why are rule of law and respect for rights necessary together?

If court decides only according to government's wish, which principle becomes weak?

Which example shows both respect for rights and obedience to law?

If administration punishes a person only due to personal enmity, what is the problem?

If parliament makes a law that removes basic rights without proper reason, what question arises?

If a citizen gets the opportunity to seek information, which democratic purpose does it help?

If a powerful person commits a crime and no investigation happens, what happens to rule of law?

If a law is used only to benefit government supporters, it is against what?

If a school teacher is removed from job for criticising the government, which right may be affected?

If a person is treated as guilty before the crime is proved, what weakens?

If a law is vague and officials apply it according to their wish, what is the danger?

Why is citizens' right to appeal in court important?

In which situation will civil liberty and security both be better protected?

If the majority bans a small group from speaking its language, what is affected?

Why is rule of law not fulfilled merely by having laws?

Quiz result

Rule of law and respect for rights

Quiz this set

Why cannot rights be given only to the majority in democracy?

If a leader says after winning election he is above law, what is the correct democratic response?

If a citizen asks questions about government policy, it is generally linked with which right?

If an accused person gets a lawyer and a chance to defend in court, what does it strengthen?

If government stops religious prayer of a group without valid reason, which right is affected?

Why are rule of law and respect for rights necessary together?

If court decides only according to government's wish, which principle becomes weak?

Which example shows both respect for rights and obedience to law?

If administration punishes a person only due to personal enmity, what is the problem?

If parliament makes a law that removes basic rights without proper reason, what question arises?

If a citizen gets the opportunity to seek information, which democratic purpose does it help?

If a powerful person commits a crime and no investigation happens, what happens to rule of law?

If a law is used only to benefit government supporters, it is against what?

If a school teacher is removed from job for criticising the government, which right may be affected?

If a person is treated as guilty before the crime is proved, what weakens?

If a law is vague and officials apply it according to their wish, what is the danger?

Why is citizens' right to appeal in court important?

In which situation will civil liberty and security both be better protected?

If the majority bans a small group from speaking its language, what is affected?

Why is rule of law not fulfilled merely by having laws?

Quiz result

Analytics choices