Rule of law and respect for rights

Question 1HardLevel 18

If governance is in the name of law but the law itself arbitrarily ends rights what should be understood?

AMere existence of law is not enough it must respect rightsBLaw is always rightCRights are unrelated to lawDArbitrariness becomes right once made law

Question 2HardLevel 18

If reasons are not written in a government decision why will citizens be weaker in challenging it?

AWithout reasons it is difficult to test validity of decisionBReasons stop votingCReasons reduce taxDReasons increase campaign

Question 3HardLevel 18

If administration rejects a group's application after seeing their identity before considering it what is the problem?

AIdentity based discrimination and lack of equal protectionBLack of polling holidayCProblem of tax collectionDProblem of road rules

Question 4HardLevel 18

If the state says rights will be available only when citizens agree with government what is the problem?

ARights will become favour dependent on agreementBRights will become saferCGovernment will become more limitedDCourts will be independent

Question 5HardLevel 18

If no legal control remains even in emergency what is the biggest danger for civil liberty?

AArbitrary power may become unlimitedBVoting will become fasterCRights will automatically be protectedDCourts will become stronger

Question 6HardLevel 18

If an institution meant to protect citizens' rights refuses complaints due to fear of government which conclusion is correct?

AInstitutional independence and rights protection are weakBRights are fully protectedCRule of law is completeDCourts are not needed

Question 7HardLevel 18

In a strict test of democracy what do rule of law and respect for rights show?

APower is limited and citizens are not only voters but also rights holdersBPower is unlimitedCRights belong only to the majorityDLaw applies only to weak people

Question 8HardLevel 18

What is the most balanced hard level conclusion on rule of law and respect for rights?

AGovernment remains bound by law rights are protected and fair justice is available for violationsBGovernment stays above lawCRights exist only by ruler's wishDCourts are not needed

Question 9HardLevel 17

If government does not publicly give reasons for restricting citizens' rights which democratic element weakens?

ATransparency and accountabilityBPolling booth decorationCSymbol recognitionDCampaign song

Question 10HardLevel 18

If a citizen gets justice for a rights violation but very late and without compensation for harm what weakness remains in rights protection?

ALack of timely and effective remedyBLack of election campaignCLack of voter listDLack of tax collection

Question 11ExpertLevel 16

If the state uses law only against opponents and leaves supporters in similar cases, which deeper weakness of rule of law is shown?

AAbsence of equal and fair application of lawBLack of election campaignCLack of polling boothsDLength of voter list

Question 12ExpertLevel 16

If the government prevents an order from being challenged in court, why will protection of citizens' rights weaken?

ABecause elections will be fasterBBecause the path of judicial remedy will be closedCBecause voting will be secretDBecause number of parties will increase

Question 13ExpertLevel 16

If a law is written in very broad words and makes even peaceful criticism a crime, what is the main danger?

AVoting age will changeBPrinting of ballot will be difficultCFreedom of expression may be arbitrarily harmedDVoter identification will be easy

Question 14ExpertLevel 16

If the majority bans a minority's worship, language, and assembly, which democratic limit is broken?

ALimit of election symbolBLimit of voter listCLimit of counting timeDLimit of rights and law on majority

Question 15ExpertLevel 16

What is the most correct difference between rule of law and rule by law?

ARule of law limits power while rule by law may use law as repressionBBoth are always the sameCRights are always safe in rule by lawDRule of law only fixes election date

Question 16ExpertLevel 16

If an accused is not given the basis of accusation and evidence, which principle weakens?

AElectoral competitionBFair process and right to defenceCPolling booth arrangementDTax policy

Question 17ExpertLevel 16

If courts decide under government pressure and cannot review independently, what is affected first?

AVoter listBElection campaignCJudicial independence and rights protectionDPolling booth decoration

Question 18ExpertLevel 16

If the government says no right will apply in crisis and there will be no review, what is the democratic concern?

AVoting will become harderBElection expenses will riseCParty registration will stopDEmergency power can become arbitrary

Question 19ExpertLevel 16

If a citizen suffers loss due to a government decision but gets no compensation or appeal, which value is weak?

AEffective rights remedyBElection symbol recognitionCVoting ageDElection campaign

Question 20ExpertLevel 16

If officials give a warning to an influential person and jail to a poor person for the same offence, what is the most correct problem?

AVoting secrecy is brokenBViolation of equal punishment and equal lawCPolitical parties weakenedDVoter list became incomplete

Rule of law and respect for rights

Quiz this set

If governance is in the name of law but the law itself arbitrarily ends rights what should be understood?

If reasons are not written in a government decision why will citizens be weaker in challenging it?

If administration rejects a group's application after seeing their identity before considering it what is the problem?

If the state says rights will be available only when citizens agree with government what is the problem?

If no legal control remains even in emergency what is the biggest danger for civil liberty?

If an institution meant to protect citizens' rights refuses complaints due to fear of government which conclusion is correct?

In a strict test of democracy what do rule of law and respect for rights show?

What is the most balanced hard level conclusion on rule of law and respect for rights?

If government does not publicly give reasons for restricting citizens' rights which democratic element weakens?

If a citizen gets justice for a rights violation but very late and without compensation for harm what weakness remains in rights protection?

If the state uses law only against opponents and leaves supporters in similar cases, which deeper weakness of rule of law is shown?

If the government prevents an order from being challenged in court, why will protection of citizens' rights weaken?

If a law is written in very broad words and makes even peaceful criticism a crime, what is the main danger?

If the majority bans a minority's worship, language, and assembly, which democratic limit is broken?

What is the most correct difference between rule of law and rule by law?

If an accused is not given the basis of accusation and evidence, which principle weakens?

If courts decide under government pressure and cannot review independently, what is affected first?

If the government says no right will apply in crisis and there will be no review, what is the democratic concern?

If a citizen suffers loss due to a government decision but gets no compensation or appeal, which value is weak?

If officials give a warning to an influential person and jail to a poor person for the same offence, what is the most correct problem?

Quiz result

Rule of law and respect for rights

Quiz this set

If governance is in the name of law but the law itself arbitrarily ends rights what should be understood?

If reasons are not written in a government decision why will citizens be weaker in challenging it?

If administration rejects a group's application after seeing their identity before considering it what is the problem?

If the state says rights will be available only when citizens agree with government what is the problem?

If no legal control remains even in emergency what is the biggest danger for civil liberty?

If an institution meant to protect citizens' rights refuses complaints due to fear of government which conclusion is correct?

In a strict test of democracy what do rule of law and respect for rights show?

What is the most balanced hard level conclusion on rule of law and respect for rights?

If government does not publicly give reasons for restricting citizens' rights which democratic element weakens?

If a citizen gets justice for a rights violation but very late and without compensation for harm what weakness remains in rights protection?

If the state uses law only against opponents and leaves supporters in similar cases, which deeper weakness of rule of law is shown?

If the government prevents an order from being challenged in court, why will protection of citizens' rights weaken?

If a law is written in very broad words and makes even peaceful criticism a crime, what is the main danger?

If the majority bans a minority's worship, language, and assembly, which democratic limit is broken?

What is the most correct difference between rule of law and rule by law?

If an accused is not given the basis of accusation and evidence, which principle weakens?

If courts decide under government pressure and cannot review independently, what is affected first?

If the government says no right will apply in crisis and there will be no review, what is the democratic concern?

If a citizen suffers loss due to a government decision but gets no compensation or appeal, which value is weak?

If officials give a warning to an influential person and jail to a poor person for the same offence, what is the most correct problem?

Quiz result

Analytics choices