History
Ordinary People and the Crimes Against Humanity
Practice questions
Why is dividing ordinary people only into criminals or victims a weak historical view?Why do people who helped victims under Nazi rule receive special place in history?What was the deepest result of the strategy of presenting victims as guilty in Nazi propaganda?Joining mass rallies in Nazi society was not always active violence, yet why was it important?Calling the Holocaust a crime against humanity rather than only a military crime emphasises what?Why is it necessary to understand the process from small discrimination to major crimes under Nazi rule?How did stopping Jewish children's education affect the future society under Nazi rule?Judges enforcing racial laws under Nazi rule shows which institutional problem?If a citizen spread a Nazi rumour instead of stopping it, what failure of citizenship does it show?Blaming Jews during unemployment and crisis under Nazi rule was an example of which political technique?Why is it necessary to understand the benefit gained by ordinary people in Nazi crimes?How did teaching Nazi ideas to children at home increase state power?How would clapping at public violence in Nazi society be read historically?Keeping Jews in ghettos under Nazi rule shows which staged process of repression?Why is comparing sources necessary while studying society's role under Nazi rule?Why cannot the moral responsibility of an ordinary citizen under Nazi rule be measured only by obeying law?How could fear and consent work together in Nazi crimes?What advanced warning does the memory of Nazi history give citizens today?What was the most dangerous result when the public accepted anti-Jewish laws as normal under Nazi rule?How could a person be connected to the crime system without directly committing violence in Nazi society?