History
Ordinary People and the Crimes Against Humanity
Practice questions
Joining an anti-Jewish meeting under Nazi rule could be what kind of social role?Why was accepting state violence as normal dangerous for society under Nazi rule?How does studying ordinary people's role prevent history from becoming only a story of leaders?Which social process was created by continuously spreading lies against Jews under Nazi rule?Using racial examples against Jews even in mathematics or biology shows what?What risk did people who helped victims take under Nazi rule?Accepting anti-Jewish laws as normal shows which moral failure under Nazi rule?Why was repeatedly broadcasting radio speeches to the public effective under Nazi rule?What kind of policy was stopping Jews from food and basic services under Nazi rule?Why are memory and memorials considered important after Nazi crimes?How did social pressure and state fear together affect citizens under Nazi rule?Why can some people be considered responsible even if they were not directly violent under Nazi rule?Studying the Holocaust as a crime against humanity emphasises what?The study of Nazi rule connects citizens today with which warning?Which is the most balanced conclusion about the role of ordinary people?What social danger is shown when ordinary people ignored victims' suffering under Nazi rule?Why is citizens passivity studied in connection with Nazi crimes?Neighbours keeping distance from Jews under Nazi rule was part of which process?How can the role of ordinary shopkeepers be seen in Nazi crimes?What was the deeper effect of removing Jews from public life under Nazi rule?