History
Ordinary People and the Crimes Against Humanity
Practice questions
Why is it limited to explain ordinary peoples silence only through fear?What did legal exclusion from citizenship and visual marking do together?How does studying mixed responses in Nazi society make history balanced?What does ordinary citizens hiding victims prove under Nazi rule?Which moral contradiction is shown by those who gained economically from Nazi crimes?Why are testimony and memory sensitive sources for historians?What final warning does the Holocaust give to democratic society?Why is it necessary to study the role of local officials in Nazi crimes?Ordinary people repeating propaganda language under Nazi rule strengthened which social process?Why was removing legal protection of victims an important step before violence under Nazi rule?Participation of educated groups in Nazi crimes challenges which simple belief?How could small everyday silences connect with major crimes under Nazi rule?What was the final aim of trying to erase victims humanity under Nazi rule?Why is balance between oral testimony and written records necessary in studying Nazi crimes?Which ethical question is most important while understanding those who benefited under Nazi rule?Preserving memory of Nazi crimes is linked with which responsibility beyond history?Why is it incomplete to explain the role of ordinary people in Nazi crimes only through fear?If a German citizen boycotted a Jewish shop and later called himself merely obedient, what would historians ask?What deeper danger was created by teaching racial science in Nazi schools?Why can language be considered part of the machinery of crimes under Nazi rule?