Arguments for and against democracy

Consultation in democracy can slow decisions. Exam tip: treat delay as an argument against democracy.

Power to choose and change government is a major benefit of democracy. Exam tip: remember elections and accountability.

Democracy gives a way to solve differences through dialogue. Exam tip: understand dialogue as democratic method.

Delay in decision is a common criticism against democracy. Exam tip: separate criticism and merits.

Through elections people can respond to wrong policies. Exam tip: treat elections as a tool of correction.

This argument is given by critics of democracy. Exam tip: place it against democracy, not in favour.

In democracy people can change government through elections. Exam tip: remember people's power.

Consulting many people is good but it can cause delay. Exam tip: understand two sides of one point.

The simplest definition of democracy is government by rulers elected by the people. Therefore, people choosing their rulers is the most basic argument in favour of democracy. Option B describes one-person rule, while options C and D also deny public participation. Exam tip: identify democracy through regular free elections and the people's power to choose rulers.

This argument against democracy states that elections may frequently change leaders and governments. This can affect continuity in policies and may lead to governmental instability. Therefore, option A is correct. Option C is incorrect because elections are a means of making leaders accountable to the people. Exam tip: remember that instability and delays in decision-making are commonly cited criticisms of democracy.

In democracy citizen's voice gets importance. Exam tip: remember equality and dignity together.

Critics say competition for power can increase corruption. Exam tip: identify it as an argument against democracy.

Democracy gives respect and participation to the individual. Exam tip: treat dignity as a pro-democracy argument.

Discussion can reduce mistakes in decisions. Exam tip: connect discussion with improvement in decision.

Accountability makes government responsible to people. Exam tip: remember the link between people and government.

Consultation makes democracy participatory but can take time. Exam tip: see both merit and criticism.

This is an argument given against democracy. Exam tip: remember the criticism about citizens' capacity.

Elections and public opinion can force government to improve. Exam tip: remember people's role.

In a democracy, decisions are usually made after discussion, debate, and consideration of different interests. Therefore, the possibility of delay in decision-making is an argument against, or criticism of, democracy. In contrast, accountable government, the scope to correct wrong decisions, and citizens’ dignity are arguments in favour of democracy. Exam tip: “delay in decision-making” is a key criticism of democracy.

Public opinion means the views, needs and judgments of citizens about public matters and government actions. In a democracy, rulers are not free to govern only according to their personal wishes. They must listen to people, consider criticism and explain their decisions. Public opinion expressed through discussions, media, meetings, petitions and elections helps citizens watch the government and ask whether it is working for the public good.

Therefore, option A is correct because public opinion gives direction to government and also creates pressure for responsible action. It can influence policies and encourage leaders to correct mistakes. The other choices describe the opposite of democratic practice: public opinion does not separate government from citizens, remove rights or end elections. Its importance lies in making government responsive and accountable to the people.