Question 1 Expert Level 20
If someone says all citizens are not experts so democracy is unacceptable what is the balanced response? A There is a limitation of expertise but discussion and accountability give chance for improvement B All citizens are always experts C There is no discussion in democracy D Wrong decisions can never be corrected
Correct answer: A Lack of expertise is a challenge but democracy has correction mechanisms. In exams give a balanced answer.
View question details Question 2 Expert Level 20
How can opposition criticism work in favour of democracy? A It increases watch and accountability over government B It ends elections C It removes citizen rights D It excludes people from governance
Correct answer: A Opposition can bring government mistakes forward. In exams connect opposition with accountability.
View question details Question 3 Expert Level 20
A criticism of democracy related to coalition government can be based on what? A People's vote ends B Elections do not occur C Compromises and delays in policy decisions may increase D Citizen dignity ends
Correct answer: C In a coalition agreement among many parties can slow decisions. In exams connect it with criticism of decision process.
View question details Question 4 Expert Level 20
If citizens' role is limited only to voting which broader aspect of democracy will weaken? A Public deliberation and active participation B Voting date C Size of ballot D Speed of counting
Correct answer: A Democracy needs discussion and watchfulness along with voting. In exams understand citizens' role broadly.
View question details Question 5 Expert Level 20
How does people's participation strengthen democracy's corrective capacity? A People can challenge wrong policies and bring change B Participation makes government permanent C Participation silences citizens D Participation ends elections
Correct answer: A Active participation keeps pressure on government for improvement. In exams write participation and correction together.
View question details Question 6 Expert Level 20
Why can short-term popularity become a criticism of democracy? A Leaders may choose immediately popular decisions over long-term interests B Leaders always take expert decisions C Elections remove citizens D People's consent ends
Correct answer: A Electoral pressure can push leaders toward popular but less useful policies. In exams write short-termism as a criticism.
View question details Question 7 Expert Level 20
What is the democratic difference between open criticism and false propaganda? A Open criticism helps improvement while false propaganda can mislead voters B Both are always the same C Open criticism ends elections D False propaganda always strengthens democracy
Correct answer: A Criticism can be a strength of democracy but misinformation is a challenge. In exams distinguish criticism from misleading information.
View question details Question 8 Expert Level 20
Equal political status strengthens which side of democracy? A Citizen dignity and equality B Money power C Policy instability D Corruption
Correct answer: A Equal political status is a basis of dignity and equality in democracy. In exams write equality as an argument in favour.
View question details Question 9 Expert Level 20
How can the possibility of power change affect rulers' behaviour? A They can ignore people B They may remain more careful and answerable to people C They always become permanent rulers D They stop elections
Correct answer: B Possibility of change in power puts pressure of accountability on leaders. In exams connect power change with accountability.
View question details Question 10 Expert Level 20
How can decision quality and public acceptance increase together in democracy? A Through consultation more sides can be included and decision can become more acceptable B Through secret order C By order of only one person D By keeping people away
Correct answer: A Consultation can make decisions balanced and acceptable. In exams write quality and acceptance together.
View question details Question 11 Expert Level 20
How can excessive political competition affect quality of governance? A It can turn governance into power struggle B It always makes citizens experts C It ends elections D It always ends differences
Correct answer: A Excessive power struggle can weaken policy and public interest. In exams treat excessive politics as a criticism.
View question details Question 12 Expert Level 20
If citizens do not participate in decision making why does the dignity argument weaken? A Because dignity is linked with citizens' voice and role B Because dignity is linked only with wealth C Because dignity has no relation with democracy D Because citizens always want to remain silent
Correct answer: A Citizens' role is a basis of dignity in democracy. In exams write dignity and participation together.
View question details Question 13 Expert Level 20
Which positive argument can balance the criticism of slow decisions? A Deliberation can reduce chances of mistakes B Elections should be stopped C People's voice should be stopped D Leaders should be made permanent
Correct answer: A Discussion takes time but can reduce hasty mistakes. In exams look at both speed and quality of process.
View question details Question 14 Expert Level 20
By what can the risk of emotional public opinion be corrected in democracy? A Through open and informed debate B By silencing citizens C By removing elections D By making government permanent
Correct answer: A Open debate can bring emotional opinion under reasoned examination. In exams write debate as a corrective element.
View question details Question 15 Expert Level 20
Giving final importance to people's vote in democracy is based on which idea? A People are the source of legitimacy of rule B The army is the source of legitimacy of rule C Dynasty is the source of legitimacy of rule D Wealth is the source of legitimacy of rule
Correct answer: A In a democracy, the legitimacy of government comes from the consent of the people, expressed through elections and voting. Therefore, people’s vote is given final importance. The army, a dynasty, or wealth cannot provide democratic legitimacy to a government. Exam tip: Remember that the basis of legitimate authority in democracy is ‘consent of the people’.
View question details Question 16 Expert Level 20
Why is it not correct to reject democracy completely despite the possibility of corruption? A Because in democracy people can challenge and change corrupt leaders B Because corruption is always good C Because people can do nothing D Because elections are unrelated to correction
Correct answer: A Corruption is a challenge but democracy has a path of accountability and change. In exams write a balanced answer.
View question details Question 17 Expert Level 20
Why is it wrong to limit people's participation only to voting? A Because democracy also includes public discussion criticism and watchfulness B Because elections are not part of democracy C Because citizens should not speak D Because participation has no value
Correct answer: A Democracy needs active citizen participation along with voting. In exams write broader participation.
View question details Question 18 Expert Level 20
How does the principle of equal vote strengthen dignity in democracy? A It treats every citizen as politically important B It gives some citizens greater political influence based on property or income C It gives voting rights only to educated citizens D It frees elected representatives from being accountable to voters
Correct answer: A Equal vote means that every adult citizen’s vote has the same value, regardless of wealth, education, caste, religion, or social position. It gives each person equal importance in political decision-making and therefore strengthens individual dignity. Option B is contrary to this principle because democracy does not give richer people extra votes or greater voting weight. Exam tip: Link ‘one person, one vote, one value’ with political equality and citizen dignity.
View question details Question 19 Expert Level 20
What type of pressure can public criticism create on government in democracy? A Corrective pressure B Hereditary pressure C Military pressure D Secret pressure
Correct answer: A Public criticism can push government to improve policy. In exams write criticism as a tool of accountability.
View question details Question 20 Expert Level 20
Why do critics consider participation of ordinary people weak? A Because ordinary people may not be experts in every policy B Because ordinary people are not citizens C Because ordinary people get no vote D Because ordinary people are always wrong
Correct answer: A This criticism is based on lack of expert knowledge. In exams treat it as a limitation not total rejection.
View question details Previous Mark for review Next Submit quiz Back to results