Muft Shiksha
Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

History

The Rise of Commercial Forestry

In this Class 9 History topic from “Forest Society and Colonialism,” students learn how colonial governments transformed forests into sources of commercial timber and revenue. The lesson explains the growth of scientific forestry, the replacement of diverse natural forests with planned plantations, and the effects of these policies on forest communities, shifting cultivation, pastoral groups, and local livelihoods. It also helps students understand why forest restrictions led to resistance and shaped changing relationships between people, forests, and the state.

Hard · Level 1 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. It made Indian forests be seen as resources for imperial shipbuilding
  2. It gave government protection to shifting cultivation in India
  3. It gave villagers full rights in reserved forests
  4. It led to the abolition of the Forest Department
View options
  1. Because huge timber demand required forest surveys, control and rules
  2. Because railways ended all government rules over forests
  3. Because railways made local communities owners of forests
  4. Because railway sleepers were made from fruit instead of iron
View options
  1. Diverse forests were changed into monoculture plantations of selected species
  2. All local species were allowed to grow without interference
  3. Forests were declared only as grazing grounds
  4. Tree cutting was permanently banned in every situation
View options
  1. Because he gave forest administration a direction of scientific and legal control
  2. Because he handed all reserved forests to local panchayats
  3. Because he stopped railway construction
  4. Because he declared commercial timber illegal
View options
  1. These forests gave valuable timber and people's rights were most restricted
  2. Villagers were allowed to farm there without rules
  3. These forests were kept only for religious pilgrimages
  4. The government had no control over these forests
View options
  1. Forests were valued as marketable timber and revenue instead of multi-use life resources
  2. Forests were considered only places of local festivals
  3. Forests were made completely unrelated to agriculture
  4. Forests were treated as empty land with no economic use
View options
  1. To secure fixed plantations and regular timber production
  2. To sell forests to farmers every year
  3. To settle railway passengers in forests
  4. To cut all trees without records
View options
  1. Applying different levels of control through legal classification
  2. Giving equal political representation to forest communities
  3. Keeping railway companies outside governance
  4. Leaving forests completely without law
View options
  1. Because fuel collection, grazing and gathering were tied to permits and rules
  2. Because villagers completely stopped using forests
  3. Because the government removed all soldiers from forests
  4. Because no valuable resources remained in forests
View options
  1. They enabled resource calculation, boundary marking and control
  2. They turned forests into local folk art centres
  3. They removed all restrictions in reserved forests
  4. They ended the need for railway sleepers
View options
  1. Timber-useful species were promoted and mixed forests weakened
  2. Local food plants received the highest government protection
  3. All trees were planted in equal proportions
  4. Forests were allowed to spread only naturally
View options
  1. Because forests were controlled for regular timber production in the name of conservation
  2. Because the government always stopped timber trade
  3. Because local people got full rights in reserved forests
  4. Because scientific forestry stopped all cutting
View options
  1. Because they could not freely take wood or graze even for their own use
  2. Because reserved forests were run only by village committees
  3. Because government officers could not enter reserved forests
  4. Because reserved forests had no valuable trees
View options
  1. Protecting new plants and future supply of useful timber
  2. Giving animals jobs in railways
  3. Teaching villagers free trade
  4. Opening textile mills in forests
View options
  1. Because livelihood-based rights were placed under government property and laws
  2. Because all communities supported railway construction
  3. Because the state made no economic use of forests
  4. Because forest laws increased local autonomy
View options
  1. They became sources of raw material for ships, railways and trade infrastructure
  2. They were used only for preserving local folk songs
  3. They remained completely separate from the empire
  4. They were converted only into village worship sites
View options
  1. More efficient forest control and production through scientific knowledge
  2. Keeping local customs above forest laws
  3. Running the Forest Department with untrained staff
  4. Leaving every forest without maps
View options
  1. Because their use was also controlled by colonial rules and classification
  2. Because they were not near any village
  3. Because they were located only in seaports
  4. Because planting trees was banned there
View options
  1. Forests were organised as sources of sustained and measured timber supply
  2. Taking timber from forests stopped immediately
  3. Railways made forest laws irrelevant
  4. Villages gained complete control over railways
View options
  1. Because traditional paths, grazing areas and collection zones became legally limited
  2. Because no rules remained in forests
  3. Because every villager became a forest officer
  4. Because worship of all trees became compulsory
View options
  1. Because policy centred on marketable timber and state revenue
  2. Because local food resources were never found in forests
  3. Because medicinal plants were used only in railways
  4. Because villagers did not need food
View options
  1. It was linked with protecting useful timber and planned plantations
  2. It was only a policy to stop village festivals
  3. It was a plan to turn forests into farms
  4. It was linked with ending the Forest Department
View options
  1. Development from beginning of state control to detailed classification and stricter limits on rights
  2. Development from local ownership to complete forest freedom
  3. Development from railway closure to abolition of the Forest Department
  4. Development from commercial forestry to protection of shifting cultivation
View options
  1. Because they considered measurement, records and scientific plans more legitimate
  2. Because local people could not identify trees at all
  3. Because the government did not adopt any scientific method
  4. Because forest officials wanted to learn only animal rearing
View options
  1. Traditional access of local communities became dependent on government permission
  2. Forest communities got all rights unconditionally
  3. Railways stopped using timber
  4. The economic importance of forests ended

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.