Why is the Right to Constitutional Remedies not merely a decorative right in democracy?

Correct answer: Because it can be used for real judicial action

The governing concept is that a right becomes meaningful when a person can enforce it. The Right to Constitutional Remedies allows an individual to approach the Supreme Court under Article 32, and the High Courts under Article 226, when a Fundamental Right is violated. Courts can examine the complaint and provide an appropriate remedy, including writs such as Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, or Quo Warranto. Thus option A is correct: the right supports real judicial action rather than merely expressing an ideal. Option B wrongly treats constitutional rights as words without enforcement, while C and D deny the central connection between rights, courts, and accountability.