Why can a citizen directly approach the Supreme Court for violation of Fundamental Rights?

Correct answer: Because the Constitution gives the right to constitutional remedies

The correct answer is A: the Constitution gives the right to constitutional remedies. This right allows a person to approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights, subject to the constitutional requirements and the facts of the case. The Court can examine the alleged violation and issue appropriate constitutional directions or writs within its jurisdiction. The purpose is to make Fundamental Rights effective rather than merely promises written in the Constitution. B is nonsensical and has no legal connection. C is wrong because the remedy protects a person’s rights; it is not based on refusing to obey law. D is unrelated because a vacant parliamentary seat does not create a right to approach the Supreme Court. Memory cue: rights become meaningful when a person can seek a constitutional remedy for their protection.