Why is appeal system above lower courts necessary for justice?

Correct answer: It gives opportunity to review and correct errors

The correct answer is A: an appeal system gives a higher court an opportunity to examine a lower court’s decision and correct a legal or procedural error when the law permits an appeal. Courts hear evidence and arguments, but mistakes can occur in understanding facts, applying law, or following fair procedure. The normal reasoning is: a lower court gives a decision; an aggrieved party uses the legal right of appeal; the higher court reviews the record and arguments within its jurisdiction; it may uphold, change, or set aside the decision according to law. Option A is correct because review and correction support a fairer justice system. Option B is wrong because an appeal does not mean every case ends immediately; it creates a further legal stage. Option C is wrong because courts do not become elections. Option D is wrong because Parliament and courts are separate institutions with different functions. An appeal is not an automatic guarantee that a party will win; it is a lawful opportunity for review. Memory cue: appeal means “a second legal look,” not a new election or a guaranteed reversal.