Which example clearly connects the scope of Constitutional Remedies with a Fundamental Right?

Going to court against an unreasonable restriction on freedom of expression

Freedom of speech and expression is a Fundamental Right subject to constitutionally permitted reasonable restrictions. If a public authority imposes an unreasonable restriction, the affected person may approach a competent court and seek a constitutional remedy, including an appropriate writ where the conditions are satisfied. Option A therefore connects a specific Fundamental Right, an alleged state restriction, and judicial enforcement. Options B and C are ordinary market or preference disputes, not necessarily constitutional violations. Option D is a private interpersonal disagreement and normally lacks the public-law element required for an Article 32 remedy. The decisive reasoning is rights violation plus a proper legal forum.

This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights.