What would be the biggest weakness of Fundamental Rights without Constitutional Remedies?

Correct answer: Effective judicial remedy against their violation would become weak

The governing principle is that a right becomes meaningful only when a person can seek enforcement after a violation. Constitutional Remedies provide access to courts and allow appropriate judicial directions, including writs, against unlawful state action. Without that mechanism, Fundamental Rights could remain declarations that are difficult to enforce in real situations. Option A is correct because the practical remedy against violation would be weakened. Option B is the opposite of the constitutional logic, C wrongly denies the continuing importance of rights, and D is not a coherent description of the weakness asked about. The central reasoning is enforceability: a right without an effective remedy is considerably less powerful.