Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

What problem would arise if the executive could easily remove judges?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Judicial independence and impartiality would weaken

Correct answer: A. Judicial independence means that judges should be able to decide cases according to the Constitution, law, and evidence, without fear of punishment from the government. If the executive could remove judges easily, a judge might worry that an unpopular decision against the government could cost the judge their position. That fear could encourage partial decisions and weaken public confidence in courts. Safeguards against arbitrary removal help judges act impartially; they do not mean judges are above the law or cannot ever be removed through the constitutionally prescribed process. A is correct because easy executive removal creates pressure and weakens independence. B is the opposite. C and D are wrong because neither constitutional strength nor rights protection follows automatically from political control of judges. Memory cue: secure tenure supports fearless judging.

Related tags

Judicial IndependenceRemoval Of JudgesImpartialitySeparation Of PowersThe Judiciary (Supreme CourtHigh CourtsAnd Judicial Independence)The Judiciary Supreme Court High Courts And Judicial IndependenceWorking Of InstitutionsCivics

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.