Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

What is a similarity between the Supreme Court and High Courts regarding protection of rights?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Both can issue writs

Direct answer: A is correct. Writs are formal directions issued by constitutional courts to protect legal and Fundamental Rights and to correct unlawful action. Both the Supreme Court and High Courts can issue writs, although their jurisdiction is not identical. The Supreme Court has a constitutional role under Article 32 for enforcing Fundamental Rights, while High Courts have wider writ jurisdiction under Article 226 for Fundamental Rights and other legal rights within their jurisdiction. Option B is wrong because the Prime Minister is appointed through the constitutional executive process, not by both courts. C is wrong because Parliament is run by its presiding officers and members. D is wrong because election symbols are handled by the election administration, not by these courts. Memory cue: both courts can issue writs, but their territorial and constitutional jurisdictions differ.

Related tags

Supreme CourtHigh CourtWrit JurisdictionConstitutional RemediesThe Judiciary (Supreme CourtHigh CourtsAnd Judicial Independence)The Judiciary Supreme Court High Courts And Judicial IndependenceWorking Of InstitutionsCivics

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.