In which situation may High Court writ jurisdiction be more practical for a citizen?
Answer and explanation
Correct answer: When nearby constitutional relief is needed against a local rights violation
The governing concept is High Court writ jurisdiction under Article 226. A High Court can issue writs within its territorial jurisdiction for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and, in appropriate cases, for other legal rights as well. Consequently, when a citizen needs accessible and comparatively nearby constitutional relief against a violation occurring in the state, option A is the most practical answer. This does not mean the Supreme Court lacks authority; it means proximity may reduce difficulty and expense. Options B, C and D do not describe a reason for invoking writ jurisdiction and contradict the role of constitutional courts.
Frequently asked questions
What is the correct answer to this question?
When nearby constitutional relief is needed against a local rights violation
Why is this the correct answer?
The governing concept is High Court writ jurisdiction under Article 226. A High Court can issue writs within its territorial jurisdiction for enforcement of Fundamental Rights and, in appropriate cases, for other legal rights as well. Consequently, when a citizen needs accessible and comparatively nearby constitutional relief against a violation occurring in the state, option A is the most practical answer. This does not mean the Supreme Court lacks authority; it means proximity may reduce difficulty and expense. Options B, C and D do not describe a reason for invoking writ jurisdiction and contradict the role of constitutional courts.
Which subject and chapter does this question cover?
This is a Class 9 Civics question. Chapter: Democratic Rights. Topic: Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights.
Student feedback
Was this question useful?
👍 0 Helpful 👎 0 Not helpful
Yes 0% No 0%
0 responsesStudent Reviews
No published reviews yet.
