If a citizen’s right is affected by a new social threat and the citizen seeks protection from court, which combined idea does this show?

Correct answer: Use of both expansion of rights and Constitutional Remedies

The governing reasoning has two steps. First, recognising that a new social threat affects a protected interest may require an expanded interpretation of an existing right; this keeps constitutional protection responsive to changing conditions. Second, approaching a court for protection invokes Constitutional Remedies, because the citizen is asking a judicial institution to enforce the right or provide suitable relief. Option A is correct because the facts contain both elements: a new threat tests the scope of the right, and court action seeks enforcement. Taxation and election campaigns are unrelated to the described remedy, while the idea of ending rights is the opposite of constitutional protection. Hence A is the complete answer.