If a citizen has a Fundamental Right but no way to enforce it, what democratic problem will arise?

Correct answer: The right may remain only a theoretical claim

Direct answer: A is correct. A right becomes meaningful only when a person has a practical way to complain about its violation and seek a remedy. In India, the Right to Constitutional Remedies supports this purpose by allowing people to approach appropriate courts for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. Without enforcement, the Constitution may promise liberty or equality, but an authority could violate that promise without facing an effective legal challenge. The right would then exist mainly on paper and would not reliably protect ordinary citizens. B is wrong because a right does not become stronger merely because it is unenforced. C is wrong because the absence of a remedy usually weakens accountability rather than increasing it. D is wrong because no enforcement route cannot produce immediate justice. Remember: a promise becomes an effective right when there is a remedy for violation.