If a citizen directly approaches the Supreme Court for violation of a right, which constitutional idea is used?

Correct answer: Constitutional remedy under Article 32

The governing concept is the Right to Constitutional Remedies. Article 32 enables a person to approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of Fundamental Rights when a violation occurs. The Court may issue appropriate writs, such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto or certiorari, according to the case. Thus, the clue “directly approaches the Supreme Court” together with violation of a Fundamental Right leads to option A. Option B is not a constitutional remedy, while C and D may be possible practical steps in some matters but cannot replace the guaranteed judicial remedy under Article 32.