How did Public Interest Litigation widen the scope of Constitutional Remedies?

Correct answer: It allowed others besides directly affected persons to approach courts in public interest

Public Interest Litigation widened Constitutional Remedies by relaxing the traditional rule that only the directly injured person should approach the court. Under PIL, a public-spirited individual or organisation may raise a genuine issue affecting a group, disadvantaged people, or the public at large, especially when the affected persons cannot easily reach the courts themselves. This expands access to justice and makes rights protection more socially inclusive. Option A is correct because it describes this broader standing in public-interest cases. PIL does not close courts, abolish Fundamental Rights, or reserve legal protection for traders; therefore B, C, and D contradict its purpose.