Approaching courts when Fundamental Rights are violated strengthens which idea in democracy?

Correct answer: Legal remedy and accountability

Direct answer: B is correct. A right is not merely a promise written in the Constitution; it must have an enforceable remedy. When a person approaches a court, the court can examine the alleged violation, require the authority to justify its action, and issue an appropriate order or writ when necessary. This gives citizens legal protection and makes public officials accountable. A is wrong because access to courts checks arbitrariness rather than strengthening it. C is wrong because judicial access encourages citizens to speak and seek justice. D is wrong because Fundamental Rights place limits on majority power and protect individuals and minorities from unconstitutional action. The remedy may not guarantee that every case is decided for the petitioner, but it guarantees a lawful process for challenging abuse. Memory cue: rights plus remedy equals practical protection and accountability.