Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why should the judiciary have freedom to hear cases against the government?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because the government is also bound by law and the Constitution

Direct answer: A is correct. Judicial independence means that courts can examine a dispute without improper pressure from the government or another powerful actor. In a constitutional democracy, the government receives authority from law and must act within the Constitution. If an executive decision is illegal or violates a right, an affected person must be able to challenge it before an independent court. The court can then interpret the law and provide an appropriate remedy. B is exactly opposite to the rule of law: government is not above the Constitution. C is wrong because citizens need remedies when public power harms them. D is wrong because courts also hear constitutional, criminal, administrative and public disputes, not only private matters. Memory cue: independent courts make “public power answerable to law.”

Related tags

Judicial IndependenceRule Of LawGovernment AccountabilityConstitutional DemocracyThe Judiciary (Supreme CourtHigh CourtsAnd Judicial Independence)The Judiciary Supreme Court High Courts And Judicial IndependenceWorking Of InstitutionsCivics

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.