If courts are impartial but access to justice is difficult, what problem will remain?

Correct answer: Equal justice will remain weak in practice

Correct answer: A. Impartiality means that a court decides cases fairly, without favouring one side. Access to justice means that people can actually approach the court, understand the process and seek a remedy. Both are necessary for meaningful justice. If poor, distant, frightened or disadvantaged people cannot reach the court because of cost, delay, distance or complicated procedures, fair judging on paper will not give them real protection. Option A is correct because equal justice must work in practice, not only in theory. Option B is wrong because difficult access does not automatically destroy judicial independence. Option C is wrong because Parliament can continue making laws even when court access is difficult. Option D is wrong because the government does not become a court merely because citizens face barriers. Memory cue: fair decision plus reachable court equals effective justice.