Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

What does lack of court jurisdiction in a case indicate?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: That court lacks legal power to hear that case

The correct answer is A. Jurisdiction is the legal authority or boundary within which a court may hear and decide matters. It may depend on the type of dispute, the place where an event occurred, the level of court, or another rule of law. If a court lacks jurisdiction, it cannot properly decide that particular case; the matter may have to go before the competent court. A does not mean that the claim is false or that the person has no rights. B is wrong because every court is bound by law and its jurisdiction. C is wrong because lack of jurisdiction says nothing by itself about the truth of the case. D is wrong because rights and the proper forum are separate questions. Memory cue: jurisdiction means “power to hear,” not “power above law.”

Related tags

JurisdictionLegal AuthorityCourt LimitsAccess To JusticeThe Judiciary (Supreme CourtHigh CourtsAnd Judicial Independence)The Judiciary Supreme Court High Courts And Judicial IndependenceWorking Of InstitutionsCivics

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.