Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

How does the problem of pending cases in courts affect the principle of justice?

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Delay in justice can deny timely relief and may reduce trust in the judiciary

Direct answer: A is correct. Justice is meaningful only when a lawful remedy is available within a reasonable time. If a case remains pending for too long, an injured person may wait for compensation, protection, release, restoration of property or another remedy while the harm continues. Witnesses and evidence may also become difficult to rely on, and people may lose confidence in courts. A is correct because excessive delay can make a legal remedy ineffective and may amount to denial of timely justice. B is wrong because a pending case has not yet received a final decision. C is wrong because pendency is a workload and delay problem; it does not automatically remove judicial independence. D is wrong because delays can affect ordinary citizens as well as governments. Memory cue: justice delayed can become justice denied.

Related tags

Pending CasesDelayed JusticeAccess To JusticeJudicial TrustThe Judiciary (Supreme CourtHigh CourtsAnd Judicial Independence)The Judiciary Supreme Court High Courts And Judicial IndependenceWorking Of InstitutionsCivics

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.