How is judiciary's interpretation of law different from executive's implementation of law?

Correct answer: Judiciary decides meaning and validity while executive implements it

The correct answer is A. When a legal phrase is unclear or two sides disagree about its meaning, the judiciary interprets the law by applying constitutional principles, legal rules, and the facts of the case. Courts may also examine whether a law or government action is constitutionally valid. The executive has a different role: it administers policies, carries out laws, maintains services, and takes practical steps through officials. Implementation must follow the Constitution, the law, and judicial directions. Option A is correct because it separates interpretation and constitutional review from administration and enforcement. Option B reverses the normal institutional roles: courts decide cases, while tax collection is generally an executive function under law. Option C is wrong because neither institution is limited to campaigning. Option D is wrong because both institutions are bound by and connected with the Constitution. Memory cue: courts explain and test the law; the executive applies and administers it.