One person, one vote, one value

This principle shows person-based equal voting right. Exam tip: write both one vote and equal value together.

Changing vote value on the basis of wealth is against political equality. Exam tip: keep economic status and vote value separate.

Universal adult franchise accepts equal participation of all eligible adults. Exam tip: link franchise with equality.

A lower-value vote breaks equality of citizens. Exam tip: treat community-based vote inequality as against democracy.

This principle gives separate political identity to every eligible person. Exam tip: remember the difference between family-based and person-based vote.

In democracy the vote belongs to each eligible person, not to the family. Exam tip: remember a separate vote for every eligible person.

The direct answer is C: political equality would become weak. One person, one vote, one value means that a person’s official position must not make the person’s vote more powerful. Reasoning step by step: the officer and the ordinary citizen are both citizens; each has one vote; each valid vote must have equal political weight. If the officer’s vote is counted as more valuable, citizenship is no longer equal and the election gives unequal influence. Option A, election timing, concerns when voting happens, not the weight of a vote. Option B, secrecy of voting, concerns whether others can know a person’s choice; it does not directly concern equal value. Option C is correct because unequal vote value directly attacks political equality. Option D, the voter list, records eligible voters but does not itself decide whether one vote is stronger. Remember: public office may involve duties, but it does not purchase extra voting power.

In this principle vote value does not change by social or economic identity. Exam tip: keep equal political value central.

Denying franchise to women is against equal citizenship rights. Exam tip: identify gender-based voting discrimination as wrong.

The direct answer is B: every eligible voter’s vote is counted with equal importance. The “one value” part does not mean that every election must produce the same result; it means that the counting rule must treat valid votes equally. Reasoning: identify eligible voters, allow each one vote, and count each valid vote once with the same weight. Option A is wrong because wealth cannot increase a vote’s value. Option B is correct because it states equal importance for every eligible voter’s vote. Option C is wrong because a rural voter’s vote cannot automatically be reduced to half on the basis of residence. Option D is wrong because an officer does not receive a second counting of the vote merely because of office. The democratic test is equality in political influence, not the voter’s income, location, or job. Exam cue: “equal importance,” “equal counting,” and “same weight” usually indicate one value.

Property-based franchise blocks equal participation of all eligible citizens. Exam tip: connect property qualification with inequality.

Changing vote value by region breaks equal political status. Exam tip: treat regional vote inequality as wrong.

Government formed through equal votes shows people's equal political will. Exam tip: connect legitimacy with equal vote.

Reducing vote value on caste basis is against equal citizenship. Exam tip: identify caste-based vote inequality.

Counting one vote twice breaks equal value of other votes. Exam tip: remember one vote one count.

Political equality is clearly seen through equal vote in elections. Exam tip: treat vote as a tool of citizen equality.

Education does not make a citizen's vote value higher or lower. Exam tip: keep qualification and vote equality separate.

Higher vote value based on profession is against democratic equality. Exam tip: treat profession-based vote inequality as wrong.

This principle says each eligible person's vote has equal political importance. Exam tip: connect political importance with vote value.

Tax payment or wealth should not be the basis of political value of vote. Exam tip: connect citizenship with equal vote.

Equal value of minister's and labourer's votes shows political equality. Exam tip: remember citizen equality above office and profession.

The direct answer is B: votes do not have equal value. Universal franchise means that all eligible adult citizens are allowed to vote, but democracy also requires equal weight for each vote. Reasoning: women receive the right to vote; however, each woman’s vote is counted as only half; therefore one citizen’s vote has less political effect than another’s. The right exists formally, but equality is violated in practice. Option A is wrong because universal franchise is not fully equal when some votes are reduced. Option B is correct because unequal counting creates unequal vote value. Option C is irrelevant: half-counting does not prove that women participate more. Option D is wrong because an election cannot become fairer by discriminating against one group. Remember to check both access to voting and the weight given to every vote.

Changing vote value according to office is opposite to this principle. Exam tip: identify the inequality statement.

Highly unequal representation can make the effect of citizens' votes unequal. Exam tip: understand balance of population and representation.

One value also means equality of political effect of vote. Exam tip: check both counting and effect.