One person, one vote, one value

Giving everyone a vote is not enough every vote must also have equal value. In exams identify one vote and one value separately.

One person one vote shows equality in number while one value shows equal importance. In exams keep both parts separate.

Limiting franchise on the basis of tax payment is against equal political rights. In exams understand tax and franchise separately.

Changing vote value on the basis of education is against democratic equality. In exams keep education and vote value separate.

This principle is linked with political equality not economic equality. In exams write vote as a tool of political voice.

Equal franchise is real only when vote value is also equal. In exams check both right and value.

Giving less importance to a community's vote is against equal political status. In exams write community based vote value as wrong.

Giving two votes breaks the principle of one person one vote. In exams remember number of votes and value of vote separately.

Taking away voting right on religious basis is against equal political rights. In exams write franchise as a non discriminatory right.

In democracy majority is correct only when all votes are counted with equal value. In exams connect majority with equal votes.

Changing vote value by region weakens political equality. In exams identify the link between regional discrimination and vote value.

Higher vote value based on office is against democratic equality. In exams keep power and vote value separate.

One equal vote is the direct electoral form of political equality. In exams treat it as a basic test of democracy.

Along with franchise equal value in counting is also necessary. In exams check equality in both voting and counting stages.

Keeping women and poor people out is against universal adult franchise. In exams remember the right of all eligible adults.

In democracy political voice is not decided by tax or wealth. In exams write equal political voice as a basic principle.

This principle treats every citizen as politically equal. In exams write equal citizenship and equal vote together.

Giving extra votes to royal family is political privilege. In exams understand privilege as against equal vote.

Counting votes of weaker groups less destroys equal participation. In exams connect equal participation with equal vote value.

Legitimacy of election result also depends on equal vote value. In exams write the link between legitimacy and equal consent.

Lower vote value reduces a citizen's political voice. In exams remember the relation between vote value and voice.

The direct answer is B: did every eligible citizen get a vote with equal political effect? This is the deepest test because it checks both parts of the principle, not merely the appearance of voting. Reasoning: first ask whether every eligible citizen can participate; second ask whether each person has one vote; third ask whether every vote has equal influence in counting and representation. Option A is irrelevant because ballot colour is a design detail, not a measure of political equality. Option B is correct because it tests equal participation and equal political power. Option C is irrelevant because good campaign music does not make votes equal. Option D is irrelevant because a candidate’s fame does not determine whether the election gives citizens equal influence. A person may vote in an election, yet equality can still fail if some votes are weighted more heavily. Exam cue: focus on access plus equal effect, not on decoration, entertainment, or popularity.

One vote being equal to three votes breaks equal vote value. In exams understand weighted vote as inequality.

Property based extra influence weakens political equality. In exams write property based privilege as against democracy.

Changing vote value by caste or wealth is against this principle. In exams write discrimination based vote value as unacceptable.