Civics
Arguments for and against democracy
Practice questions
When can lack of quick decision making in democracy become a serious problem?Discussion in democracy is slow but which risk can it reduce?If minority views are also heard in democracy which side becomes stronger?Policy instability becomes a criticism of democracy due to what reason?Treating citizens as participants in democracy challenges what?How should accountability and criticism of corruption be understood together?What is the most balanced conclusion about arguments for and against democracy?Despite criticisms why can democracy be considered a better option?If democracy has weaknesses but citizens can openly challenge them which quality does it show?Which idea best shows an expert-level balanced view on democracy?If democracy takes slow decisions but consults affected groups before deciding what is the most mature evaluation?If someone says people may choose a wrong leader in democracy what is the strongest democratic counter argument?Why does the accountability argument in democracy go beyond elections alone?If electoral competition in democracy increases polarisation in society which conclusion is appropriate?Why is the dignity argument in democracy broader than only the right to vote?If money power starts influencing the electoral process which criticism of democracy becomes stronger?If democratic debate is based on slogans rather than facts why will the better decision argument weaken?When critics say popularity is not a guarantee of competence what distinction do they highlight?If a system gives quick decisions but does not take people's consent which argument best supports democracy?The criticism of populist promises in democracy is linked to which risk?