Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights

Question 1ExpertLevel 89

Which option shows misuse of constitutional remedies?

AFiling a petition only for private publicity in the name of public interestBSeeking Habeas Corpus for illegal detentionCSeeking Mandamus for public dutyDSeeking Quo Warranto for validity of public office

Question 2ExpertLevel 89

How should the roles of courts and legislature be understood in expansion of rights?

ACourts interpret rights and legislature can strengthen them through lawsBBoth courts and legislature are outside the ConstitutionCOnly courts are democracyDLegislature has no relation with rights

Question 3ExpertLevel 89

Which statement gives the most precise expert explanation of constitutional remedies?

AIt is the system of judicial enforcement that makes Fundamental Rights realBIt is only a textbook chapterCIt leaves rights to government wishDIt deprives citizens of legal remedy

Question 4ExpertLevel 89

Which statement gives the most precise expert explanation of expansion of rights?

AIn a changing society interpretation of rights extends to new needs of dignity liberty and justiceBExpansion of rights ends rightsCExpansion of rights makes courts inactiveDExpansion of rights only increases tax

Question 5ExpertLevel 89

If a citizen directly approaches the Supreme Court for violation of a right which constitutional idea is used?

AConstitutional remedy under Article 32BOnly local customCOnly administrative requestDOnly private compromise

Question 6ExpertLevel 89

In which situation may High Court writ jurisdiction be more practical for a citizen?

AWhen nearby constitutional relief is needed against a local rights violationBWhen the citizen wants no rightCWhen the matter is only an international warDWhen courts have no power

Question 7ExpertLevel 89

In a question on expansion of rights which option should be considered most doubtful?

AOne saying rights are fixed and never connect with changing needsBOne linking dignity with lifeCOne linking information with accountabilityDOne linking environment with quality of life

Question 8ExpertLevel 89

What is the most balanced expert-level conclusion on constitutional remedies and expansion of rights?

AConstitutional remedies enforce rights and the scope of rights can develop according to dignity justice and new needsBConstitutional remedies end rightsCExpansion of rights removes the role of courtsDFundamental Rights are only slogans

Question 9ExpertLevel 88

If there is a demand to bring a new social problem within the scope of rights, what would be the most constitutional approach?

ATo examine the demand on the basis of dignity, equality and constitutional valuesBTo treat every demand as a Fundamental Right without examinationCTo always keep new problems outside courtsDTo treat expansion of rights as against democracy

Question 10ExpertLevel 89

If a court gives a broader meaning to an old Fundamental Right in a new social context what process does it show?

AConstitutional expansion of the scope of rightsBAutomatic end of rightsCCourt moving away from rightsDConstitution becoming only a historical document

Question 11ExpertLevel 90

If Fundamental Rights are only written but there is no remedy to approach court when they are violated, what would be the most serious problem?

ARights will not remain effective and enforceableBElections will automatically stopCAll schools will become privateDThe tax system will end

Question 12ExpertLevel 90

In what sense is the Right to Constitutional Remedies considered the protector of other Fundamental Rights?

AIt automatically ends every rightBIt gives a route to enforce a right through court when it is violatedCIt gives rights only to government officersDIt separates citizens from the Constitution

Question 13ExpertLevel 90

In which situation is the spirit of Article 32 most clearly visible?

AA citizen directly approaches the Supreme Court for enforcement of a Fundamental RightBA citizen participates in a sports competitionCThe government issues a weather reportDA school celebrates annual day

Question 14ExpertLevel 90

Which statement is most balanced while understanding the writ power of High Courts?

AHigh Courts can issue writs to protect rightsBHigh Courts hear only sports mattersCHigh Courts work outside the ConstitutionDHigh Courts stop citizens from going to court

Question 15ExpertLevel 90

If a person is detained without valid reason, which form of constitutional remedy is most appropriate?

AMandamusBHabeas CorpusCQuo WarrantoDProhibition

Question 16ExpertLevel 90

In which example would demanding a writ of Mandamus be most logical?

AAn officer is refusing to perform a legal dutyBA person is illegally holding a public officeCA lower court is going beyond jurisdictionDA person is detained without reason

Question 17ExpertLevel 90

What is the actual purpose of the writ of Quo Warranto?

ATo end illegal detentionBTo question the legality of a person holding public officeCTo stop a lower courtDTo order an officer to perform duty

Question 18ExpertLevel 90

On what basis can the main difference between Prohibition and Certiorari be understood?

AOne is linked with preventing and the other may be linked with cancelling a wrong orderBBoth are linked only with tax collectionCBoth are linked only with school admissionDNeither has any relation with courts

Question 19ExpertLevel 90

Which statement correctly relates judicial review and constitutional remedies?

ABoth help keep the government under the ConstitutionBBoth end citizens’ rightsCBoth relate only to election campaigningDBoth make the judiciary inactive

Question 20ExpertLevel 90

In which case would PIL be considered linked with public interest rather than private interest?

AA petition against inhuman treatment of prisoners in jailBA hall booking dispute for one’s birthday partyCDisliking decoration of one’s private shopDA private gift dispute between two friends

Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights

Quiz this set

Which option shows misuse of constitutional remedies?

How should the roles of courts and legislature be understood in expansion of rights?

Which statement gives the most precise expert explanation of constitutional remedies?

Which statement gives the most precise expert explanation of expansion of rights?

If a citizen directly approaches the Supreme Court for violation of a right which constitutional idea is used?

In which situation may High Court writ jurisdiction be more practical for a citizen?

In a question on expansion of rights which option should be considered most doubtful?

What is the most balanced expert-level conclusion on constitutional remedies and expansion of rights?

If there is a demand to bring a new social problem within the scope of rights, what would be the most constitutional approach?

If a court gives a broader meaning to an old Fundamental Right in a new social context what process does it show?

If Fundamental Rights are only written but there is no remedy to approach court when they are violated, what would be the most serious problem?

In what sense is the Right to Constitutional Remedies considered the protector of other Fundamental Rights?

In which situation is the spirit of Article 32 most clearly visible?

Which statement is most balanced while understanding the writ power of High Courts?

If a person is detained without valid reason, which form of constitutional remedy is most appropriate?

In which example would demanding a writ of Mandamus be most logical?

What is the actual purpose of the writ of Quo Warranto?

On what basis can the main difference between Prohibition and Certiorari be understood?

Which statement correctly relates judicial review and constitutional remedies?

In which case would PIL be considered linked with public interest rather than private interest?

Quiz result

Right to Constitutional RemediesExpanding scope of rights

Quiz this set

Which option shows misuse of constitutional remedies?

How should the roles of courts and legislature be understood in expansion of rights?

Which statement gives the most precise expert explanation of constitutional remedies?

Which statement gives the most precise expert explanation of expansion of rights?

If a citizen directly approaches the Supreme Court for violation of a right which constitutional idea is used?

In which situation may High Court writ jurisdiction be more practical for a citizen?

In a question on expansion of rights which option should be considered most doubtful?

What is the most balanced expert-level conclusion on constitutional remedies and expansion of rights?

If there is a demand to bring a new social problem within the scope of rights, what would be the most constitutional approach?

If a court gives a broader meaning to an old Fundamental Right in a new social context what process does it show?

If Fundamental Rights are only written but there is no remedy to approach court when they are violated, what would be the most serious problem?

In what sense is the Right to Constitutional Remedies considered the protector of other Fundamental Rights?

In which situation is the spirit of Article 32 most clearly visible?

Which statement is most balanced while understanding the writ power of High Courts?

If a person is detained without valid reason, which form of constitutional remedy is most appropriate?

In which example would demanding a writ of Mandamus be most logical?

What is the actual purpose of the writ of Quo Warranto?

On what basis can the main difference between Prohibition and Certiorari be understood?

Which statement correctly relates judicial review and constitutional remedies?

In which case would PIL be considered linked with public interest rather than private interest?

Quiz result

Analytics choices