Correct answer: A. Monitoring may become irregular
Explanation: Direct answer: Option A, monitoring may become irregular. A quality standard tells us what level of performance is acceptable, but it does not tell us how often performance should be checked. Step 1: separate the two ideas: the standard is the expected quality, while inspection frequency is the timing or regularity of checking. Step 2: observe that without a stated frequency, different employees may inspect daily, weekly, rarely or only after a complaint. Step 3: conclude that defects may remain unnoticed for too long and comparisons may become unfair. Step 4: set a clear schedule, such as checking each batch, each week or at another suitable interval. Option A is correct because missing timing makes monitoring inconsistent. Option B, objective will be removed, is wrong; the objective still exists even if the monitoring plan is incomplete. Option C, resources will be available automatically, is wrong because writing a standard cannot create staff, money or materials. Option D, the programme will not remain a rule, is not the issue; a programme is an action plan, while the real problem here is incomplete monitoring. Memory cue: quality control needs both “what to check” and “when to check.”