Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects
0 reads0 ratings0 helpful

Why is it incomplete to call Tsar Nicholas II's abdication only a personal decision?

Advertisement

Answer and explanation

Correct answer: Because it resulted from mass movement army mutiny and state crisis

Nicholas II's abdication was not merely a private choice made by one ruler. In February 1917, strikes and demonstrations grew because of shortages, war hardships, and dissatisfaction with the government. Soldiers in Petrograd began to support or join the protesters instead of defending the Tsar. The Duma and the wider political crisis also weakened his authority, making continued rule impossible.

Option A is correct because it connects the abdication with mass protest, military mutiny, and a crisis of the state. Option B gives an imaginary personal motive. Option C is historically wrong, and option D confuses the February events with later developments. The abdication was therefore a result of the February Revolution and the collapse of Tsarist support. The answer is A.

Related tags

Tsar Nicholas IiAbdicationState Crisis

Frequently asked questions

What is the correct answer to this question?

Because it resulted from mass movement army mutiny and state crisis

Why is this the correct answer?

Nicholas II's abdication was not merely a private choice made by one ruler. In February 1917, strikes and demonstrations grew because of shortages, war hardships, and dissatisfaction with the government. Soldiers in Petrograd began to support or join the protesters instead of defending the Tsar. The Duma and the wider political crisis also weakened his authority, making continued rule impossible.

Option A is correct because it connects the abdication with mass protest, military mutiny, and a crisis of the state. Option B gives an imaginary personal motive. Option C is historically wrong, and option D confuses the February events with later developments. The abdication was therefore a result of the February Revolution and the collapse of Tsarist support. The answer is A.

Which subject and chapter does this question cover?

This is a Class 9 History question. Chapter: Socialism in Europe and the Russian Revolution. Topic: The Russian Revolution.

Was this question useful?

No ratings yetWrite a review / Rate this question

Student Reviews

No published reviews yet.

Advertisement