Civics
Nomination of candidates and election campaigns
Practice questions
If only ruling party achievements are shown with government expense in campaign which principle is affected?Why is it better to discuss policy achievements and limitations together in campaign?If the campaign period is made very short what effect may it have on voters?Why are rules on loudspeakers and processions democratically necessary in campaigns?If a candidate has a big contradiction between past work and current promises what should voters do?Why can fact based criticism in campaign be considered democratic?If a candidate's declaration gives education but hides policy what should voters be careful about?If social media campaign spreads quickly what caution is most necessary for voters?If nomination is proper but the candidate makes completely false claims in campaign what weakness remains?What is the common purpose of transparency in nomination and campaign?If only rich candidates get practical ease in nomination what concern arises?Why is stopping criticism by opposition harmful for voters in campaign?If campaign promises benefit only one community and ignores others what concern may arise?If campaign expenditure account is not public what will voters find difficult to understand?If a small candidate following rules cannot campaign while a big candidate breaks rules and campaigns what problem is clear?How can the process from nomination to campaign be linked with voter empowerment?If a candidate avoids public interaction in campaign what will voters lack?Which question can be used as a combined democratic test of nomination and campaign?Which is the most balanced conclusion about nomination and election campaigns?Why is nomination considered the legal beginning of electoral competition?