Civics
Nomination of candidates and election campaigns
Practice questions
If a candidate speaks on local problems what benefit do voters get?If voters get no chance to ask questions during campaign what weakness will arise?Why is a deadline for nomination necessary in the election process?What can be considered the purpose of nomination formalities like security deposit?If scrutiny of nomination is biased what will be the effect on electoral competition?If a candidate is stopped from campaigning within rules what effect will it have on voters' choice?Together what do expenditure limit and code of conduct strengthen in campaigns?While reading a manifesto what should voters see besides promises?If a candidate has contradiction between past work and current promises what can voters do?Why is it necessary that different views reach voters during campaign?If only ruling party achievements are shown at government expense during campaign what concern arises?In which situation will a candidate's declaration be most useful for voters?If misinformation spreads widely in campaign what problem remains despite free voting?Why should policy based debate and candidate declaration be studied together in campaigns?If a candidate hides information about serious allegations after nomination what effect will it have on transparency?Threatening voters and giving money in campaign look different yet what common problem do they share?If issues of women or weaker groups are not raised at all in campaign what weakness appears?When can posters and pamphlets become a problem in election campaign?Which statement best links nomination and campaign with voters' informed decision?If the final candidate list is declared very late what effect can it have on campaign and voter information?