Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है
In this Class 9 Civics topic from the chapter Democratic Rights, students learn how the Right to Equality supports fairness and equal citizenship in India. They study equality before the law, equal protection of the laws, and the ban on discrimination based on religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. The topic also explains equal opportunity in public employment, the abolition of untouchability, and the removal of titles, helping students connect constitutional principles with everyday democratic life.
TOPIC PRACTICE
Quiz this set
Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.
25 questions
Choose questions
Expert · Level 4View options
When deprived children are given real access to education
When hotel entry is denied by caste
When birth-based title is given
When equal law is applied differently
Expert · Level 4View options
Prohibition of discrimination in public places under Article Fifteen
Abolition of titles under Article Seventeen
Untouchability under Article Eighteen
Religious worship under Article Sixteen
Expert · Level 4View options
Abolition of titles
Equality before law
Freedom of religion
Public employment
Expert · Level 4View options
Denying entry by religion
Denying well access by caste
Making a child below fourteen work in a hazardous factory
Denying job by place of birth
Expert · Level 4View options
It may be a measure to increase real equality
It is always a title
It is always religion-based discrimination
It ends rule of law
Expert · Level 4View options
Whether the difference has rational basis and valid purpose
Whether they speak the same language
Whether they celebrate the same festival
Whether they read the same book
Expert · Level 4View options
When an officer does not act on a caste discrimination complaint
When a child reads a poem
When a citizen worships
When a family travels
Expert · Level 4View options
When an eligible candidate is stopped from a public post due to religion
When a person reads a private book
When a community celebrates its festival
When a student takes part in sports
Expert · Level 4View options
It is an example of paper equality and practical inequality
It is religious freedom
It is cultural protection
It is right to education
Expert · Level 4View options
Religious diversity
Formation of status-based society instead of equality-based citizenship
Fairness in public employment
Child labour
Expert · Level 4View options
Because merit-based classification may be linked with a rational purpose
Because equality does not apply
Because every difference is discrimination
Because the Constitution does not see jobs
Expert · Level 4View options
Denying service in a public hotel on caste basis
Writing a private diary
A person studying at home
A family having private meal
Expert · Level 4View options
It is support for deprived people
It is real equality
It can be arbitrary privilege
It is abolition of untouchability
Expert · Level 4View options
By giving equal legal status and a claim against discrimination
By placing him outside law
By making him only a taxpayer
By making him dependent on government favour
Expert · Level 4View options
It can be a public issue of equality and dignity
It is only private entertainment
It is freedom of religion
It is abolition of titles
Expert · Level 4View options
They are against equality in every situation
They can be a constitutional means to create real equal opportunity
They are only titles
They are unrelated to equality
Expert · Level 4View options
Everyone gets equal use of public road beyond caste
A person writes a private story
A person chooses food
A family has private celebration
Expert · Level 4View options
It does not reach real equality
It gives freedom of religion
It removes titles
It ends public employment
Expert · Level 4View options
Because even equal law can give unequal results through bias
Because law is not needed
Because equality is only for books
Because officers are above law
Expert · Level 4View options
Equality before law equal protection prohibition of discrimination employment opportunity abolition of untouchability and titles
Only religious propagation and worship
Only begar and child labour
Only language and script
Expert · Level 4View options
Equality reduces discrimination and creates fair opportunity
Equality ends justice
Equality gives only privilege
Equality is unrelated to law
Expert · Level 4View options
Prohibition of discrimination and protection of public access
Only voting process
Only religious worship
Only linguistic curriculum
Expert · Level 4View options
Title creates birth-based superiority which is against equal citizenship
Title always increases equality
Title removes untouchability
Title is public employment
Expert · Level 4View options
Treating citizens equal in legal status opportunity and dignity
Giving everyone the same income
Giving everyone the same occupation
Making all special measures illegal
Expert · Level 4View options
It strengthens equal citizenship by stopping discrimination arbitrariness and privilege
It is only a school admission rule
It is only a list of titles
It is limited only to government jobs
Question 1ExpertLevel 4
In which situation does Right to Equality play a positive and not merely prohibitive role?
Correct answer: A
Giving real access shows the positive side of equality. In exams, connect positive equality with opportunity.
If an officer says that because of office he is above law, which idea of equality proves him wrong?
Correct answer: B
The direct answer is B, Equality before law. This means that every person, whether ordinary citizen or powerful officer, is subject to the same law. The Constitution does not allow a public office to make a person legally superior to everyone else. The reasoning is: the officer holds a position created under law; the law gives that position its powers; therefore the officer must also obey the law and can be held responsible for unlawful action. Option A, abolition of titles, concerns official or hereditary titles and does not directly express the rule that nobody is above law. Option B is correct because it directly rejects special legal status based on office. Option C, freedom of religion, protects belief and religious practice, not immunity from law. Option D, public employment, concerns equal opportunity in government jobs, not an officer’s authority over the law. Memory cue: equality before law means “same law for everyone, no one above law.”
Google Analytics helps us understand site usage. Google may send limited cookie-free signals before your choice. The Live Visitors widget operates independently of this analytics choice; see the privacy policy for its provider and fallback details. Essential site features work without analytics cookies. You can change your choice later in Privacy choices. Privacy policy