Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Medium · Level 6 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. Experience of strict control and distance from home
  2. Experience of gaining landlord rights
  3. Experience of selling forest produce
  4. Experience of running sea ships
View options
  1. Freedom to vote
  2. Freedom to move and leave plantations
  3. Freedom to graze in forests
  4. Freedom to collect rent from peasants
View options
  1. The movement was limited only to cities
  2. The national message reached different groups with different meanings
  3. Workers had no contribution
  4. Swaraj meant only landlordism
View options
  1. Because everyone’s problems were exactly the same
  2. Because they saw solutions to their local problems in the movement
  3. Because they wanted to strengthen colonial rule
  4. Because the movement was only for traders
View options
  1. Because it clarifies the social diversity of the movement
  2. Because it makes all groups look the same
  3. Because it hides local issues
  4. Because it makes history only about dates
View options
  1. They connected peasants to the movement through local issues
  2. They separated villages from the movement
  3. They only increased landlords’ power
  4. They sent plantation workers to forests
View options
  1. Labour exploitation of peasants
  2. Quality of foreign clothes
  3. Development of sea ports
  4. Growth of forest tourism
View options
  1. As a conflict over rural power and exploitation
  2. As a dispute over sea trade
  3. As a dispute over urban schools
  4. As a plan of the forest department
View options
  1. Both linked local injustice with the wider national struggle
  2. Both were examples of only urban movements
  3. Both were led by plantation owners
  4. Both supported colonial rule
View options
  1. Peasants wanted relief from rent while workers wanted freedom to return home
  2. Peasants wanted forests closed while workers wanted rent increased
  3. Peasants wanted colonial rule while workers wanted landlordism
  4. Peasants were plantation owners while workers were talukdars
View options
  1. Because the leadership wanted to keep the movement non-violent and disciplined
  2. Because the leadership did not want peasants in the movement
  3. Because the leadership opposed forest rights
  4. Because the leadership wanted to make plantation workers kings
View options
  1. Because it connected people by understanding their language and problems
  2. Because it strengthened colonial rule
  3. Because it kept people away from politics
  4. Because it worked only in cities
View options
  1. Because it included forest rights labour exploitation and resistance to colonial control
  2. Because it was only a school movement
  3. Because it was only a foreign cloth movement
  4. Because it was only a wage dispute of plantation workers
View options
  1. Freedom of movement and control over one’s life
  2. Freedom to become landlords
  3. Freedom to close forests
  4. Freedom to do sea trade
View options
  1. Because it affected daily needs and traditional rights
  2. Because it increased plantation workers’ wages
  3. Because it reduced peasants’ rent
  4. Because it stopped foreign trade
View options
  1. Because rent forced labour and eviction affected dignity along with income
  2. Because peasants only did sea trade
  3. Because peasants had no social position
  4. Because peasants were forest officers
View options
  1. Because peasants tribals and plantation workers also joined with their problems
  2. Because no urban person joined
  3. Because the movement belonged only to kings
  4. Because the movement belonged only to colonial officials
View options
  1. Peasants used rural social relations as a tool of struggle
  2. Peasants left the movement
  3. Peasants strengthened colonial rule
  4. Peasants imposed government restrictions on forests
View options
  1. Nationalism is shaped by many social experiences
  2. Nationalism was only one leader’s idea
  3. Nationalism was only foreign trade
  4. People had no role in nationalism
View options
  1. Forests were the base of tribal life culture and livelihood
  2. Forests were only city parks
  3. Forests were only landlords’ houses
  4. Forests had no relation with tribals
View options
  1. Workers’ free movement was controlled
  2. Workers were fully free without rules
  3. Workers had rights over all forests
  4. Workers collected tax from landlords
View options
  1. They turned it into collective and organised demands
  2. They turned it into foreign trade
  3. They turned it into forest tourism
  4. They turned it into plantation labour
View options
  1. Combining different demands into a wider disciplined movement
  2. Removing all demands completely
  3. Running the movement only in cities
  4. Gathering support for colonial rule
View options
  1. Swaraj had become linked with everyday suffering of common people
  2. Swaraj was only a palace discussion
  3. Swaraj had no relation with workers and peasants
  4. Swaraj was only sea trade
View options
  1. It showed that anti-colonial resistance existed even in distant tribal regions
  2. It increased support for colonial rule
  3. It spread the movement only in cities
  4. It made peasants landlords

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.