Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Medium · Level 4 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. Their freedom to move and leave work was restricted
  2. They were made landlords
  3. They received full rights over forests
  4. They received foreign cloth for free
View options
  1. The meaning of swaraj could change according to the condition of each group
  2. Swaraj was only a right of landlords
  3. Swaraj had no relation with workers
  4. Swaraj was only a plan to close forests
View options
  1. To see them in the context of their local problems and hopes
  2. To treat them only as a list of dates
  3. To treat them only as urban events
  4. To see them as support for colonial rule
View options
  1. It became a wider mass movement
  2. It became only a movement of kings
  3. It remained only a movement of foreign trade
  4. It became completely a school movement
View options
  1. Peasants saw swaraj as hope of freedom from local exploitation
  2. Peasants saw swaraj as increasing landlords’ income
  3. Peasants saw swaraj as closing forests
  4. Peasants saw swaraj as helping plantation owners
View options
  1. Local leadership connects people’s language and suffering with the movement
  2. Local leadership always strengthens colonial rule
  3. Local leadership keeps people away from movements
  4. Local leadership works only in cities
View options
  1. Because the leadership wanted to keep the movement non-violent and disciplined
  2. Because the leadership was unaware of all peasant demands
  3. Because the leadership wanted to send plantation owners home
  4. Because the leadership wanted to give forest laws to tribals
View options
  1. Forest control forced labour and threat to livelihood
  2. Establishment of new schools and exam rules
  3. Sea trade and port taxes
  4. Landlords’ crop prices and markets
View options
  1. Both connected their local sufferings with the larger national struggle
  2. Both openly supported colonial rule
  3. Both lived only in cities
  4. Both were led by plantation owners
View options
  1. The understanding of swaraj was linked with the needs of social groups
  2. Swaraj was only a policy of foreign trade
  3. Swaraj had no relation with villages
  4. Swaraj was only the demand of plantation owners
View options
  1. The national movement was connecting with personal and collective suffering
  2. The national movement was limited only to tax policy
  3. Workers had no place in the national movement
  4. The national movement strengthened plantation rules
View options
  1. It was a broad movement formed by many social experiences
  2. It was a limited movement of one city
  3. It was only a meeting of landlords
  4. It was only a plan of the forest department
View options
  1. Because forced labour took away wages and hurt dignity
  2. Because forced labour made peasants richer
  3. Because forced labour was only related to festivals
  4. Because forced labour increased forest rights
View options
  1. Nai-Dhobi bandh
  2. Tea plantation port
  3. Forest tourism meeting
  4. Sea ship movement
View options
  1. Government control increased and traditional rights weakened
  2. Government control decreased and all restrictions ended
  3. Tribals received forests without restrictions
  4. Plantation workers received a new tax
View options
  1. As hope of freedom from control and return home
  2. As an order to serve landlords
  3. As making forest laws stricter
  4. As a right to buy foreign cloth
View options
  1. They were also linked with dignity security and social justice
  2. They were only a plan of sea trade
  3. They were only demands of the forest department
  4. They were only linked with school rules
View options
  1. Peasant demands expanded the movement but leadership also wanted discipline
  2. Congress had no relation with peasants
  3. Peasants only supported colonial rule
  4. Congress was formed only for forest laws
View options
  1. He gave both symbol and direction to tribal discontent
  2. He stopped plantation workers
  3. He increased rent from peasants
  4. He made forest laws against people
View options
  1. Because peasants tribals and workers had different needs
  2. Because all groups had the same occupation
  3. Because no group had any demand
  4. Because the word swaraj had no use
View options
  1. They carried local demands to national politics in an organised way
  2. They turned all peasants into plantation workers
  3. They increased government restrictions on forests
  4. They reduced taxes of colonial rule
View options
  1. Because they were linked with rights to life and resistance to colonial control
  2. Because they were only sports competitions
  3. Because they were only fairs of landlords
  4. Because they were linked with urban shopping
View options
  1. Peasants saw hope of land security in political change
  2. Peasants saw eviction as trade benefit
  3. Peasants saw leaving land as swaraj
  4. Peasants saw plantation work as freedom
View options
  1. Both affected tribal livelihood and freedom
  2. Both made foreign cloth cheaper
  3. Both made landlords tax free
  4. Both made plantation workers owners
View options
  1. Workers’ freedom of movement and choice was limited
  2. Workers were completely free
  3. Workers only collected tax from landlords
  4. Workers did not have to follow any rule

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.