Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Medium · Level 2 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. Animal rearing and daily livelihood were affected
  2. Sea trade increased
  3. Landlords’ rent decreased
  4. Movement of plantation workers increased
View options
  1. They saw swaraj as the hope of leaving restrictions and returning home
  2. They saw swaraj as a plan to become landlords
  3. They saw swaraj as a chance to close forests
  4. They saw swaraj as a way to strengthen foreign rule
View options
  1. They could not leave plantations without permission
  2. They could not farm without permission
  3. They could not pay tax without permission
  4. They could not go to school without permission
View options
  1. Because they lived under strict control in distant plantations
  2. Because they wanted more rent from landlords
  3. Because they wanted to close forests
  4. Because they wanted to protect foreign officials
View options
  1. Because their problems and life conditions were different
  2. Because everyone had the same demand
  3. Because nobody had complaints against British rule
  4. Because everyone lived only in cities
View options
  1. The movement included different hopes of many groups
  2. The movement was limited only to cities
  3. The movement had no popular participation
  4. The movement was only for traders
View options
  1. Because they could expand the rural base of the national movement
  2. Because they gave more tax to foreign rule
  3. Because they increased control over forests
  4. Because they benefited plantation owners
View options
  1. Because losing land meant losing livelihood
  2. Because peasants were leaving sea trade
  3. Because peasants were becoming plantation owners
  4. Because peasants were becoming forest officers
View options
  1. A struggle against power and exploitation in rural society
  2. A struggle for control over sea routes
  3. A struggle for profits of foreign banks
  4. A struggle to increase forest tourism
View options
  1. Because ordinary villagers could easily connect with them
  2. Because only officials understood them
  3. Because they took peasants away from farming
  4. Because they strengthened forest laws
View options
  1. Because it was unjust pressure on their labour and freedom
  2. Because it gave them higher wages
  3. Because it increased their forest rights
  4. Because it made plantation workers return home
View options
  1. Because tribal life culture and livelihood were linked with forests
  2. Because foreign banks operated in forests
  3. Because forests increased landlords’ rent
  4. Because forests were only city parks
View options
  1. Because each region had different local problems
  2. Because all regions only had plantations
  3. Because everyone had the same occupation
  4. Because no region had exploitation
View options
  1. Both linked local injustice with the national struggle
  2. Both took place only in cities
  3. Both supported foreign officials
  4. Both were led by plantation workers
View options
  1. Because the nature of their problems was different
  2. Because neither had any problem
  3. Because both were sea traders
  4. Because both were forest officials
View options
  1. People often understood the national message according to their local hopes
  2. Everyone understood the same plan in the same way
  3. Workers did not want any freedom
  4. The national movement was only a trade movement
View options
  1. They saw swaraj as relief from rent forced labour and exploitation
  2. They saw swaraj only as a new market
  3. They saw swaraj as closing forests
  4. They saw swaraj as strengthening foreign rule
View options
  1. Because forest produce was linked with their food fuel and income
  2. Because forest produce made foreign armies
  3. Because forest produce closed schools
  4. Because forest produce automatically reduced rent
View options
  1. Because he gave leadership and direction to tribal discontent
  2. Because he increased the power of landlords
  3. Because he stopped plantation workers
  4. Because he promoted foreign rule
View options
  1. Because it connects people by understanding their language and problems
  2. Because it always supports foreign rule
  3. Because it keeps people away from issues
  4. Because it limits the movement to cities
View options
  1. It connected large rural groups with the movement
  2. It limited the movement only to the capital
  3. It kept peasants away from politics
  4. It gave rural support to foreign rule
View options
  1. The meaning of swaraj changed according to the needs of groups
  2. Swaraj only meant plantation labour
  3. Swaraj only meant landlord power
  4. Nobody understood the meaning of swaraj
View options
  1. Exploitation linked with rent forced labour and eviction
  2. Tribal rights over forest produce
  3. Return home of plantation workers
  4. Establishment of foreign schools
View options
  1. It was also linked with dignity livelihood and resistance to colonial control
  2. It was only about leave for plantation workers
  3. It was only about buying foreign cloth
  4. It was only a demand of urban traders
View options
  1. The national message reached different social groups in different forms
  2. Workers had no role in the national movement
  3. The national movement belonged only to landlords
  4. There were no local hopes in the national movement

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.