Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Hard · Level 7 · 14 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 14 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

14 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. There was cooperation but also tension over direction and method
  2. They had no relation
  3. Peasants were only supporting landlords
  4. Leadership was limited only to plantation workers
View options
  1. National inspiration could be similar but local method could differ
  2. There was no national connection in either
  3. The Gudem movement was completely urban
  4. Gandhian non-cooperation was meant to make forest laws stricter
View options
  1. Because common people’s problems came to the centre of the movement
  2. Because people were removed from the movement
  3. Because only officials remained important
  4. Because all demands ended
View options
  1. All three gave meaning to swaraj through their life conditions
  2. All three supported colonial rule
  3. All three demanded only reduction of rent
  4. All three were urban traders
View options
  1. Different demands of Awadh peasants Gudem tribals and Assam plantation workers
  2. Name of only one leader
  3. Only one date
  4. Example of only one city
View options
  1. Peasants wanted relief from unjust rent forced labour and eviction
  2. Peasants wanted to increase talukdars’ power
  3. Peasants wanted to stop plantation workers
  4. Peasants wanted to make forest laws stricter
View options
  1. Because tribal traditions and community life were connected with forests
  2. Because forests were only urban property
  3. Because forest rights had no relation with life
  4. Because plantation workers owned forests
View options
  1. It shows that the movement reached distant labour groups too
  2. It shows that the movement remained only in big cities
  3. It shows that workers had no problems
  4. It shows that swaraj had no relation with workers’ lives
View options
  1. It could greatly expand the movement’s base in villages
  2. It would limit the movement only to cities
  3. It would hide rather than end peasant problems
  4. It would give rural support to colonial rule
View options
  1. Because it was difficult to keep local militancy within non-violent national discipline
  2. Because peasants had no demands
  3. Because no people lived in villages
  4. Because all landlords were in the Kisan Sabha
View options
  1. It shows that large movements were made from common people’s suffering and hope
  2. It makes history only a list of dates
  3. It removes the role of people
  4. It focuses only on policies of officials
View options
  1. Identifying region problem leadership and meaning of swaraj separately for each group
  2. Remembering only one slogan
  3. Linking all groups with one cause
  4. Leaving out local events
View options
  1. Diverse local struggles gradually joined a shared hope of swaraj
  2. All local struggles remained separate and did not connect with nationalism
  3. The movement remained limited to the elite
  4. Swaraj developed no popular meaning
View options
  1. Indian nationalism became a mass movement through the meeting of local sufferings and shared imagination of swaraj
  2. Indian nationalism was only one leader’s plan
  3. Peasants tribals and workers had no role in Indian nationalism
  4. Local life had no importance in Indian nationalism

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.