Update

Muft Shiksha™ एक 100% Free Education Portal है 🇮🇳, जिसका उद्देश्य Class 9–12 के हर विद्यार्थी तक High-Quality Education को पूरी तरह मुफ्त पहुँचाना है। 🇮🇳 हम मानते हैं कि अच्छी शिक्षा किसी student की आर्थिक स्थिति पर निर्भर नहीं होनी चाहिए। 🇮🇳 हर विद्यार्थी को वही Quality Study Material, MCQs, Quizzes, Exam Preparation, Concept-Based Learning और Bilingual Support मिलना चाहिए, जो आमतौर पर महंगी Coaching या Premium Platforms में मिलता है। Muft Shiksha™ 🇮🇳 इसी सोच के साथ बनाया गया है

Subjects

Social Science

Differing Strands within the Movement

Class 10 Social Science explores how India’s national movement brought together groups with different experiences, demands and expectations. Students examine the participation of peasants, tribal communities, plantation workers, business groups, workers, women, Dalits and Muslims, and see why their involvement did not always follow the same path. The topic highlights both the strength of collective action and the social tensions and limits within nationalism in India.

Hard · Level 6 · 25 questions

TOPIC PRACTICE

Quiz this set

Up to 25 questions from this page. Select your focus, then start.

25 questions

Choose questions
View options
  1. Because they weakened community rights over forests and increased government control
  2. Because they gave forests to tribals without restrictions
  3. Because they made plantation workers talukdars
  4. Because they ended peasants’ rent
View options
  1. For them swaraj was hope of leaving plantations returning home and escaping control
  2. For them swaraj meant increasing landlords’ power
  3. For them swaraj meant making forest laws stricter
  4. For them swaraj meant protecting colonial rule
View options
  1. Because workers were not free to leave plantations without permission
  2. Because workers got full rights over forests
  3. Because peasants’ rent was reduced
  4. Because talukdars’ power ended
View options
  1. People understood the national message according to their local suffering
  2. The national message was understood only in cities
  3. Workers stayed away from the movement
  4. Swaraj had no local meaning
View options
  1. Because their sufferings and life conditions were different
  2. Because both had exactly the same problems
  3. Because both wanted to strengthen colonial rule
  4. Because both wanted restrictions on forests
View options
  1. That all people joined the movement for one reason and in one meaning
  2. That peasants were involved in the movement
  3. That tribals wanted forest rights
  4. That workers wanted to return home
View options
  1. Organised demands of rural peasants and the issue of local injustice
  2. The issue of honouring colonial officials
  3. The issue of plantation owners’ profit
  4. The issue of freedom of sea trade
View options
  1. Landlord exploitation was central in Awadh while forest rights and forced labour were central in Gudem
  2. Only plantation workers joined both
  3. Neither had any local issue
  4. Both aimed to strengthen colonial rule
View options
  1. Both linked local suffering with anti-colonial feeling and hope of swaraj
  2. Both were examples of only urban movements
  3. Both strengthened forest laws
  4. Both were under plantation owners
View options
  1. Peasants wanted relief from rent tribals forest rights and workers return home
  2. All groups only wanted to buy foreign cloth
  3. All groups wanted to become talukdars
  4. All groups wanted to restrict forests
View options
  1. Peasants tribals and workers joined it with different problems
  2. Only traders of one city joined it
  3. People had no role in it
  4. All groups had exactly the same demand
View options
  1. The mass base expanded but giving disciplined direction to different demands became difficult
  2. The movement ended completely and no participation remained
  3. Colonial rule strengthened and swaraj ended
  4. Demands of landlords and workers became identical
View options
  1. Because it was also linked with rights culture labour and state control
  2. Because tribals had no economic problem
  3. Because it was only a problem of plantation workers
  4. Because it was only a dispute of talukdars
View options
  1. It connects swaraj with daily freedom and movement
  2. It makes swaraj only landlords’ property
  3. It limits swaraj only to forest laws
  4. It makes swaraj support for colonial rule
View options
  1. It connected nationalism with villages and problems of daily life
  2. It limited nationalism only to palaces
  3. It kept peasants out of politics
  4. It made the national movement a meeting of colonial officials
View options
  1. Because talukdars were powerful sources of economic and social pressure
  2. Because talukdars were plantation workers
  3. Because talukdars were forest officers
  4. Because talukdars were giving peasants unconditional freedom
View options
  1. Organisation gave voice and boycott created pressure
  2. Organisation weakened peasants and boycott protected landlords
  3. Both ended forest rights
  4. Both stopped plantation workers
View options
  1. Because his importance lay in giving leadership and direction of resistance to tribal discontent
  2. Because his movement was a wage dispute of plantation workers
  3. Because he opposed forest rights
  4. Because he was a representative of talukdars
View options
  1. It should be understood not merely as violence but in the background of local injustice and forest control
  2. It should be read as support for colonial rule
  3. It should be seen as a demand of plantation owners
  4. It should not be separated from peasants’ rent dispute
View options
  1. The shared hope of swaraj took different forms in different social experiences
  2. All regions had exactly identical problems
  3. The national movement happened only in cities
  4. Local problems had no historical importance
View options
  1. It misses social groups’ problems and different understandings of swaraj
  2. It includes too many dates
  3. It shows support for colonial rule
  4. It includes only forest rights
View options
  1. Working without wages was both economic loss and social humiliation
  2. Forced labour gave peasants more land
  3. Forced labour weakened talukdars
  4. Forced labour was only religious service
View options
  1. Food fuel income and traditional life
  2. Only urban trade
  3. Only school examination
  4. Only talukdars’ rent
View options
  1. Their hope of freedom was clashing with colonial labour control
  2. They were completely free citizens
  3. They had already received forest rights
  4. They were protesting in favour of talukdars
View options
  1. It clarifies each group’s specific condition and national connection
  2. It makes all groups identical
  3. It hides local issues
  4. It leaves the movement meaningless

Add Muft Shiksha to your Home Screen

In Safari, tap Share, then Add to Home Screen.